CHAPTER ONE
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background of the
Problem
Greilling (2010) defines the concept
of organizational performance is common in the academic literature; its
definition is difficult because of its many meanings. Organizational
performance has continually become an important field of management study. It
was developed as a strategic orientation to overcome the external adaptation
problems faced by firms, which have been looking for sustainable competitive
advantage in global competition in the last thirty years. Researchers and
practitioners have been interested in the concept since the early of 1980s
because of its profitable effect on firms’ performance. The French and the
Canadians were the first to use the Balance Score Card in a different form. The
French began using a measure called “the tableau de board”, or the dashboard of
measure, which included both financial and non-financial measures. The emphasis
on quality in the American continent during the 1980s made Canadian companies
to include non-financial measures also in evolving their business strategy.
This was the initial conception of the balanced scorecard (Stewart & Hubin,
2001).
The balance score card gets its name
from the need to balance the financial objectives with the non-financial
objectives. Performance can be viewed as dynamic and therefore it requires
understanding from management and line staff so that a decision can be made in
the end as a result of interpretation of the subject. Performance may be illustrated
by using a causal model that describes how current actions may affect future
results. Performance may be understood differently depending on the person
involved in the assessment of the organizational. To define the concept of
performance is necessary to know its elements characteristic to each area of
responsibility. To report an organization's performance level, it is necessary
to be able to quantify the results (Lynch 2009). For any organization to
achieve its objectives, there are key performance indicators in making sure
that the organization is either meeting their goals or performing well by all
standards.
In the hospitality industry it is
important that when a hotel is setting their goals for the year, they should be
achievable, measurable, specific, and realistic and most importantly time
bound. When they base their decisions on these two factors, they fall short of
examining their internal
environment therefore missing the mark
on the vital components that helps their hotel function better and even reach
their optimum by trying to meet and exceed guest expectations.
Organizational performance is defined
as the ability of an organization to have proper governance and have managers
who are objective in achieving the goals of the organization and being
persistent in achieving the mission and vision of the organization (Richard,
2013). Organization performance is measured in the goals or objectives that
have been set out by the management of any company. The performance is measured
by the organization’s financial performance, market performance and the
shareholders performance (Jones & Charles, 2010). The stakeholders that are
taken into account are internal (employees, executive officer, managers and
board members) and external stakeholders. In 2013, there was a survey conducted
by a company, Mercer, in 53 countries globally was determine the internal and
external factors that affect the performance of any organization had over
10,000 respondents. It found that the respondents were working in 1056 companies
(non-profit, profit and government institutions). It also found that 51 percent
of the respondents thought that the planning process needed improvement, 42
percent stated that an organization would perform better if their compensation
and reward systems were revised and 41 per cent thought that the approach used
by their management needs work. Out of the survey, one third of the respondents
thought that with the change of the Chief Executive Officers in organizations,
there is bound to be a lot of change in the styles of management and this
affects how a company performs at local and international level in the case of
a multi-national company. This is because the way the incumbent thinks and mode
of operation is different from the outgoing. As a result, the organizational
culture changes to suit the incumbent way of implementing the same strategy
communicated by the Board of the companies that were studied.
In the United States of America,
performance of organizations is done by the top management to ensure that the
non-financial measures are looked into to steer the organization to success.
The top level management ensures that they are setting up their employees for
success by having personal development plans. The Hilton Hotel and Accor brand
give their staff a management code of conduct that controls their behavior.
This impacts their culture such that all Accor and Hilton hotels have a
specific culture that is developed. Consequently, they have a culture that is
hard to change (Hilton, 2013). This has helped these brands develop a corporate
identity and values which stem from how they do their things. The
implementation system of the career development of their staff is deeply
entrenched in their value system (Travel courier, 2010).
In the developing countries,
hospitality firms check their performance by having regular strategy meetings
to plan on their way forward in relation to their competition and make sure
that they have proper strategies in place to beat their competition. As a
result, they do a lot of market research to make sure that they are in first
place at all times in terms of revenue generation and customer satisfaction.
Hotels in Singapore and Malaysia gain their competitive advantage in low-cost
leadership through discounting of their products and providing quality services
to their customers to achieve customer loyalty. Having low cost strategy in the
Asian market and other developing countries may have a positive effect on
gaining market share in the short term, but has a negative impact on the
profitability of a hotel in the long term. Studies done on the Malaysian market
show that competition gives pressure to the managers in the hospitality firms
to make sure that they push down their costs in a labor intensive environment
(Molina &Azori, 2008). Punniyamoorthy and Morali (2008) suggested the
balance score card as a benchmarking tool for organizations, therefore a
measure of performance. In a dynamic environment like the hospitality industry,
managers do not have the time to respond to the current trends. As a result,
they measure their performance based on the financial goals that they set and
the customer satisfaction.
FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE IN THE HOSPITALITY INDUSTRY
Chapters: 1 - 5
Delivery: Email
Delivery: Email
Number of Pages: 75
Price: 3000 NGN
In Stock

No comments:
Post a Comment
Add Comment