CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1
Background information
The positive perception of a country‟s
image is an important standard for judging her standing in the international
community. A good image translates to respect, influence and prestige. To
ensure that this respect is accorded to any country, governments initiate
policies that would ensure economic growth, reduction in unemployment and
improvement in the quality of life of the citizens. While, a bad or negative
perception of a country‟s image indicates that such a country lacks respect,
influence and prestige in the international community. The factors that can
determine a nation‟s image (for good or bad) can be both internal and external.
Internally, a succession of regimes of bad policies and practice can lead to
this. Externally, it could be through participation in foreign military and
humanitarian missions (Egwemi, 2010; Adeleye, 2009). An image problem usually
occurs when there are both internal and external factors that sway the pendulum
towards a bad/negative image. Whatever the source of an image problem. Many
countries would to do all that is possible to overcome such an image.
In Nigeria, since the inception of the
present democratic rule in 1999, the country had been struggling with image
problems. These problems range from corruption in high places like bribing of
highly placed officials before one can secure a job, start a business and run
it peacefully, lack of transparency, fraud, electoral manipulations, political
assassination and others. This situation has been so aggravated by the
activities of Nigerians who have taken to crime such as cyber crime, 419 and
these people operate in all the sectors of the country‟s economy. This
situation is captured by Ishiekwene (2004:1) when he notes that:
Those of us living in the western
world, Europe and America in particularly, would testify to the humiliation and
embarrassment suffered daily in the hands of bankers, potential employers and
even ordinary neighbors because they have Nigeria links. And it is not only the
whites that stigmatize Nigerians, even Africans, including Ghanaians,
Cameroonians, South Africans , Zimbabweans and a host of our surrounding
neighbors in west African look on Nigerians as crooks, liars, thieves, drug
pushers, 419 – kidnappers, assassins and social miscreants of various shades.
Really, Nigeria has many large numbers
of criminals giving the country a bad name across the globe. We seem to be in a
hurry to make money and for many Nigerians, the money must be made at all cost
and through any means. Even those elected into positions of trust, amass wealth
by stealing from government coffers mindlessly by using many crooked means,
such as falsification of contract papers, initiation of jumbo projects, and
outright conversion of government money to their private use.
This situation is not helped by a
growing level of poverty, which has now debased most Nigerians. There is too
much poverty, unemployment and underemployment in Nigeria. At the face of these
developments, various governments including the present government now embarked
upon programs to help improve the image of the country, such as the N600
Million Naira image laundering program of the Obasanjo regime, the creation of
EFCC, the re-branding programs and the heart of African project the splashing
$1.2 million on a U.S public Relations and lobby firm, Levick, to help change
international and local media narrative”.
In 2013, the Federal government as
reported in Premium Times paid flesh man – Hilliard inc. $ 60.000 to help
arrange interviews with foreign channels including CNN. . These programs were
initiated by these different governments to help improve the image of the
country in spite of the worsening un-employment problem which has worsened the
crime situation in the country. This study therefore, intends to investigate
the effect of unemployment to the realization of the image laundering project
of the Nigerian government.
1.2 Statement of Problem
Since the commencement of this
democratic era in 1999, a very big problem that has confronted the country
remains the problem of tarnished image of the country. This problem of negative
image developed as a result of the involvement of Nigerians in the perpetration
of crimes such as cyber fraud, 419 activities (obtaining by tricks), money
laundry, kidnapping, assassinations, armed robbery and the monumental
corruption perpetrated by government officials. Due to the effect of these
problems of poor image; Nigeria which should be a model for the rest of Africa
has lost its pride of place because countries like Ghana which seem to have
taken the initiative are occupying the front row and have left the back bench
for Nigeria.
Also, Obama‟s non recognition of
Nigeria during the administration of Yar‟Adua and the non-invitation of Nigeria
to attend the G20 summit in London in 2009 (Ameru 2009, Nigerian compass, 2009;
Akuta, 2009).
This image problem is also covered by
the level of unemployment in the country necessitated by the high rate of
corruption and government‟s poor policies. To address this image problem, the
various governments from 2006-2015 initiated various image laundering projects
such as the „‟re-branding project‟‟, the spending of N600 Million Naira by the
Obasanjo regime in image laundering, “Heart of Africa Project‟ and the.
Splashing $1.2 million on a U.S public Relations and lobby firm, Levick, to
help change international and local media narrative”.
In 2013, the Federal government as
reported in Premium Times paid flesh man – Hilliard inc. $ 60.000 to help
arrange interviews with foreign channels including CNN. These projects have
gulped Billions of naira, and at home, unemployment which is the main root why
crime in the country has worsened. This study therefore, intends to investigate
the effect of un-employment on the image laundering projects of various
governments in Nigeria.
1.3 Objectives of the Study
This study aims at assessing the
influence of un-employment on the international image of Nigeria, vis-a-vis Nigeria‟s
image laundering projects (2006-2015). Other objectives
Are:
(1) To determine the various types of
unemployed induced crimes involved into by Nigerians that have negatively
influenced the country‟s image.
(2) To critically examine the extent
unemployment has affected Nigerian‟s international image.
(3) To examine the extent of
attainment of the objectives of the various image laundering projects initiated
by Nigeria.
(4) To recommend adequate solutions
and make recommendations on how government can tackle the unemployment problem
and improve the country‟s image internationally.
1.4 Research Questions
This research questions will guide the
study:
1. What are the various crimes
involved into by Nigerians that have negatively by influenced Nigeria‟s
international image?
2. To what extent has unemployment
influenced Nigeria‟s negative image?
3. To what extent does unemployment
influence by Nigerians involved crimes that have affected Nigeria‟s
international image?
4. To what extent has unemployment
influenced the realization of the objectives of the various image laundering
projects initiated by Nigeria?
TOPIC: UNEMPLOYMENT AND INTERNATIONAL IMAGE OF NIGERIA (ASSESSING THE IMAGE LAUNDERING PROJECTS 2006-2015)
Chapters: 1 - 5
Delivery: Email
Delivery: Email
Number of Pages: 50
Price: 3000 NGN
In Stock

No comments:
Post a Comment
Add Comment