CHAPTER ONE
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
1.1 INTRODUCTION:
With the emergence of modern nation
states, modern international relations emerged as these nation-states device
and followed certain principles, courses and standards that govern their
interactions in the international community. Basically, no nation is an island,
so it becomes imperative for nation states to interact with each other. These
actions therefore formed the foreign relations of such states. Traditionally,
these actions are guided by national foreign policies that are clearly in
pursuit of national aspirations or interests. What then is/are foreign
policies?
Foreign policy is defined as the study
of actions of a state toward the external environment and conditions-usually
domestic-under which these actions are formulated (Dawisha, 1976). The domestic
condition referred to in this definition may include such things as the form of
government of such state and the public opinion and other activities or
establishment within such state. However, this does not mean that actions of
states are not influenced by external conditions too. Foreign policy can also
be said to mean a set of carefully articulated goals and objectives interpreted
in the decisions made and actions taken by a state in the pursuant of those
articulated goals and objectives when interacting with other states in the
international system (Ugwukah and Eteete, 2010).
Foreign policies do not just come
about. There are certain factors that influence or determine their formulation.
It is impossible to lay down any general rule regarding the relative importance
of each of these factors or a scale of importance which decision-makers must
permanently adhere to in making their policy decisions. Nevertheless, certain
basic determinants can be identified which most of the states in the
international system take in to account while making their policy. F.S
Northedge clearly states that the foreign policy of a country is a product of
environmental factors both internal and external to it (Ugwukah and Eteete,
2010). Thus, foreign policy formulation is influenced by internal and external
factors. The internal factors comprise factors within a particular state. In
the words of Henry Kissinger, ‗foreign policy begins where domestic policy
ends‘. The internal factors that influence foreign policy formulation include:
economic development/structure, social structure, nature and character of
political leadership, military capabilities, public opinion, history and
culture, geographic location of the state and demographic factor and so on. The
external factors (which comprise factors found in the global system) include
international organisations and regimes, world public opinion, policies and
actions of other states, the nature of the world economy and international
law/norms (Ghosh, 2013).
The best formulated foreign policy in
the world is rendered irrelevant without a clear sense of tools available to
decision makers and their respective utility. By tools we mean instrument
needed to implement foreign policy objectives and goals. Traditionally, states
have had to recourse to diplomacy, economic, subversion and military
instruments to achieve their respective aims and objectives. More recently,
these instruments, which can be termed ‗hard power‘ (the use of military and
economic or coercion and payment to influence the behaviour or interests of
other states) have been supplemented by the recognition of the importance of
incorporating ‗soft power‘ (quasi-legal instruments which do not have any
legally binding force, or whose binding force is somewhat weaker than that of
hard power) into a states range of skills available to them in implementing or
executing their foreign policy. The promotion of values through governmental
and non-governmental actors is one of the ‗soft power‘ tools which can help
states shape a target country‘s foreign policy aims. Each of these has
strengths and weaknesses in relation to a given foreign policy problem, and it
is a states‘ability to capitalise on these diverse sets of instruments that
determine whether it has a successful foreign policy or not (Alden, 2011).
Since the founding of Iraq in the
aftermath of World War I, United States policy (towards Iraq) has included
cooperation, confrontation, and war. However, the purpose of this research work
is to focus on U.S foreign policy in Iraq from the year 1991 to 2003. The U.S
2003 military invasion of Iraq and the extended occupation that followed were
certainly the most dramatic and significant events in the long history of U.S relations
with Iraq. This period spanned through the administration of former president
George W. Bush. Although the invasion of Iraq is widely regarded as the
continuation of the first gulf war, specific and different factors however
influence U.S foreign policy from 1991 -2003 (Hahn, 2012).
The United States have enduring
interests in preserving regional stability in the Middle East, countering
transnational terrorism, and advancing responsible governance. These objectives
are advanced by a stable Iraq that can serve as a constructive power. An Iraq
without the capacity to govern effectively and mechanisms to resolve conflicts
peacefully would be a destabilising presence that would harm U.S interests in
the Middle East. United States foreign policy since 2003 have overtime emerged
from the need to prevent the re-emergence of Al Qaeda or its affiliates and
keep the country from serving as a safe haven that could be used to attack
Americans and U.S allies (Nagl and Burton, 2009).
1.2 STATEMENT OF PROBLEM
The United States have series of
interests it wants to achieve in Iraq. These interests have instigated the
formulation (and execution) of different foreign policies towards the country
(Iraq). These policies have guided U.S relations with Iraq over the years.
These relations have been sources of huge concern for both the United States
and Iraq as well as among various countries of the world. Over the years,
different administrations have formulated different policies and committed
considerable amount of resources in their execution, yet it seems the U.S.A is
not achieving its stated objectives in the country. For instance, the policy of
invasion adopted under the Bush administration which sought to capture ‗Iraq‘s
Weapons of Mass Destruction‘ and to free the people of Iraq from the
dictatorial rule of Sadam Hussein, to ensure stability in the country (and the
region at large) and to curb transnational terrorism did not prove effective
from the view of the aftermath of events that occurred. Shortly after the
invasion and occupation of Iraq, the country combusted, leading to the
proliferation of Islamist fundamentalist groups, ethnic and religious militias
and insurgents; and thus leading to increase in the activities of terrorist
groups. Thus, the study intends to examine the underlying factors responsible
for the ineffectiveness of United States foreign policies in Iraq between 1991
- 2003 and also to look at ways in which future relations between the two
countries can be improved.
1.3 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
This study seeks to:
(i). assess the major factor(s)
responsible for the US war on terrorism and the subsequent invasion of Iraq in
2003.
(ii). evaluate the effectiveness of
the foreign policy decisions of the Bush administration towards Iraq;
(iii). examine the prospects for
better relations between the U.S and Iraq.
1.4 RESEARCH QUESTIONS
The research questions include:
1. What are the major factor(s)
responsible for the US war on terrorism and the subsequent invasion of Iraq in
2003?
2. How effective were/are the foreign
policy decisions of the Bush administration towards Iraq?
3. What are the prospects for better
relations between U.S and Iraq?
TOPIC: A CRITICAL ASSESSMENT U.S FOREIGN POLICY IN IRAQ 1991-2003
Chapters: 1 - 5
Delivery: Email
Delivery: Email
Number of Pages: 56
Price: 3000 NGN
In Stock

No comments:
Post a Comment
Add Comment