ABSTRACT
This research examined the concept of
code switching and code mixing in Doctor-Patient communication in Federal
Medical Centre, Cross River State. The data used for the analysis were obtained
from tape recording, questionnaire and personal observation. The analysis
employed the descriptive statistical method with Bach and Harnish (1979) Mutual
Contextual Believe (MCB) as the theoretical framework of the study. The
findings shows that code-mixing and code-switching are used very often in
Doctor-Patient communication especially when performing therapeutic functions.
CHAPTER
ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background
to the study
Communication is a process in which a
message is sent from sender to receiver. It is a practice that the sender
encodes message and the receiver decodes it. Communication may occur in small
groups or in organizations where there is work to do, or several small groups
that need to interact among each other within a single organization. Gumperz
(1982),states that communication is a ‘social activity that requires the coordinated
efforts of two or more individuals’ that construct talk to produce sentences.
However, no matter how well rounded or stylish the outcome may be, it does not
by itself constitute communication. Communication takes place only when a
common understanding is obtained among communicants. Therefore, it is necessary
to have the knowledge and ability to create and sustain conversation. The
knowledge also needs to be not only grammatical competence but also linguistic,
socio-cultural knowledge, and understanding the nature of the conversation Gumperz
(1982: 2).
Interpersonal communication is one
type of communication, which is defined in many ways. Miller(1978) defines it
based on the situation and number of participants involved and states that
interpersonal communication occurs between two individuals when they are close
in ‘proximity, able to provide immediate feedback and utilize multiple senses’.
Others such as Peters(1974) described interpersonal communication based on the
degree of personal closeness’ or perceived quality, of a given interaction; it
includes communication that is private and occurring between people who are
more than acquaintances. Canary(2003)view of interpersonal communication is
from the perspective of conversant goals. According to Dainton(2004:50) states
that communication is used to attain or achieve personal goals through
interaction with others.
As one category of interpersonal
communication, medical communication is central to clinical functions in
constructing a good doctor –patient relationship, which is one of the major
tasks in medical profession. In this regard, Van Naerssen (1985) identifies two
kinds of medical communication that includes doctor to patient and doctor to
other medical personnel communications. Naerssen claims that, both kinds belong
to different registers, each with a range of variations within it.’ The first
is the interaction between two medical professionals (doctor with nurse, doctor
with doctor, as well as nurse with nurse). The second is, the interaction between
medical professionals with their patients, which includes interviews - called
‘chief complaint’, treatments, breaking bad news, consultation and follow-ups.
Each part has its own structure and characteristic features that can be
observed and analyzed either separately or as part of a larger discourse.
1.2 Statement of Research Problem
Having a good medical communication is
important in the delivery of high-quality health care and has the potential to
help regulate patients’ emotions, facilitate comprehension of medical
information, and allow for better identification of patients’ needs,
perceptions, and expectations. Patients reporting good communication with their
medical care professional are more likely to be satisfied with their care, and
especially to share significant information for accurate diagnosis of their
problems, follow advice, and adhere to the prescribed treatment Naerssen(1985:
44).
However, according to Naerssen,
patients complain about their doctors that, they are not willing to listen, do
not answer their questions, or inform them properly. In addition they are
authoritative and unhelpful, at the same time; doctors criticize their patients
for not following their advice Naerssen (1985: 43).
For code switching and code mixing to
work properly, there should be background knowledge of more than one language
by the parties involved, the absence of which may lead to ineffective switch
and may sometimes lead to misconception of ideas, communication barrier and
misinterpretation of messages. This research therefore investigates the role of
code mixing and code switching in doctor-patient communication in Federal
Medical Centre Cross River State.
TOPIC: THE ROLE OF CODE MIXING AND CODE SWITCHING IN DOCTOR-PATIENT COMMUNICATION AT FEDERAL MEDICAL CENTRE, CROSS RIVER STATE
Format: MS Word
Chapters: 1 - 5
Delivery: Email
Delivery: Email
Number of Pages: 65
Price: 3000 NGN
In Stock

No comments:
Post a Comment
Add Comment