ABSTRACT
CBN
typically intervenes directly in the foreign exchange market to ensure that the
value of the Naira is stable. However, direct foreign exchange purchases and
sales by the monetary authorities could be very costly and are hardly effective
in reducing exchange rate volatility when the local currency is under pressure
to depreciate. Researchers have found that this kind of interventions have
little or no desired effect, and may lead to undesired volatility in the
exchange rate. In an environment of tight monetary policy, additional monetary
tightening could have effect on the exchange rate. If this is so, then reserve
loss in period of speculations can be prevented. This study sets out to examine
if Additional Monetary Tightening (AMT) can be used to achieve exchange rate stability
in Nigeria, as a potential substitute or complementary tool to the direct
intervention. The study identified the period of AMT from 2007- 2015, capturing
the periods by the use of dummy variable. The variables of the study includes
Monetary Policy Rate (MPR), Cash Reserve Requirement(CRR), Liquidity Ratio(LR),
Upper interest rate Corridor (UCORR), and Lower interest rate Corridor (LCORR),
were estimated using GARCH (2,2) with lag of one period for all the variables
and was found to be appropriate. The result shows that AMT is negative and
statistically significant at 10% in reducing the exchange rate volatility in
the variance equation and also negative and significant at 1% in appreciating
the exchange rate in the mean equation. Although all variables were correctly
signed in the variance equation except CRR, only AMT, and LR, were
statistically significant at 10% and 1% respectively in the variance equation.
This suggests that, AMT can be adopted as an alternative/complementary tool in
attaining exchange rate stability in Nigeria. From these findings, the study
recommends that where it is feasible, CBN should consider AMT as a useful tool
for exchange rate management vii and prevent reserve loss. This also suggests
that CBN must use this tool cautiously since AMT can hurt the economy via
investment and spending.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title
page ………………………………………………………………………… i
Declaration
………………………………………………………………………… ii
Certification
………………………………………………………………………… iii
Dedication
………………………………………………………………………… iv
Acknowledgement
………………………………………………………………………….. v
Abstract
…………………………………………………………………………. vi
Table
of Contents …………………………………………………………………………. viii
List
of Figures …………………………………………………………………………. xi
List
of Tables ………………………………………………………………………… xii
List
of Appendices …………………………………………………………………………. xiii
1.0
INTRODUCTION
1.1
Background to the Study………………………………………………………… 1
1.2
Statement of Research Problem………………………………………………… 6
1.3
Research Problem……………………………………………………….…………. 8
1.4
Objective of the Study…………………………………………………………… 8
1.5
Research Hypothesis………………………………………………………………. 9
1.6
Justification of the Study………………………………………………………… 9
1.7
Scope and limitation of the Study………………………………………………… 10
1.8
Organization of the Study…………………………………………………………. 11
2.0 LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1
Introduction…………………………………………………………………………. 12
2.2
An Overview of the Foreign Exchange Market in Nigeria……………………… 12
2.3
Conceptual Literature……………………………………………………………… 16
2.3.1
The Concept of Monetary Policy and Exchange Rate…………………………….. 16
2.3.2
Exchange Rate Volatility…………………………………………………………… 19
2.3.3
Additional Monetary Tightening……………………………………………………. 22
2.4
Theoretical Literature……………………………………………………………… 25
2.5
Theoretical Framework…………………………………………………………… 38
2.6
Empirical Literature……………………………………………………………… 39
3.0 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
3.1
Introduction…………………………………………………………………………. 53
3.2
Conceptual Framework for Analysis……………………………………………… 53
3.3
Empirical Framework……………………………………………………………… 57
3.4
Unit Root Test………………………………………………………………………. 62
3.5
Data and Sources…………………………………………………………………… 63
4.0 PRESENTATION AND
DISCUSSION OF RESULTS
4.1
Introduction…………………………………………………………………………. 65
4.2
Episodes of Additional Monetary Tightening in Nigeria (2007-2015)………… 65
4.3
Trend of/ and Exchange Rate Volatility in Nigeria (2007-2015)………………… 67
4.4
GARCH Model Estimation………………………………………………………… 71
4.4.1
Normality Test Result………………………………………………………………. 71
4.4.2
Unit Root Test Result……………………………………………………………….. 72
4.4.3
Effect of Additional Monetary Tightening on Exchange Rate Volatility…………… 73
4.5
Extent to which Additional Monetary Tightening can be a Complementary Tool
5.0 SUMMARY, CONCLUSION
AND RECOMMENDATION
5.1
Summary……………………………………………………………………………… 79
5.2
Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………. 80
5.3
Recommendations…………………………………………………………………… 81
REFERENCES………………………………………………………………………………….84
APPENDICES…………………………………………………………………………………..89
List of Figures
Figure
3.2.1 The Conceptual Framework for Analysis
Figure
4.2.1 Additional Monetary Tightening
Figure
4.3.1a Trend of/and Exchange Rates Volatility in Nigeria
Figure
4.3.1b Additional Monetary Tightening and Exchange Rates
List of Tables
Table
4.4.1 Descriptive Statistics Results
Table
4.4.2 Augmented Dickey Fuller Unit Root Test Results
Table
4.4.3a GARCH Estimations: Conditional mean and Variance Equation
Table
4.4.3b ARCH-LM Diagnostic Test
Table
A1 Empirical Studies on Monetary Tightening and Exchange Rate
List of Appendices
Appendix
A Empirical Studies on Monetary Tightening and Exchange Rate
Appendix
B Glossary of Selected Terms
Masters Project Topics in Economics
EFFECT OF ADDITIONAL MONETARY TIGHTENING ON EXCHANGE RATE VOLATILITY IN NIGERIA
Department: Economics (M.Sc)
Format: MS Word
Chapters: 1 - 5, Preliminary Pages, Abstract, Appendices
Pages: 108
Price: 5000 NGN
In Stock
No comments:
Post a Comment
Add Comment