Critical Appraisal of Foreign Direct
Investment FDI in Nigeria
Chapter One
1.0 Introduction
The traditional economic theory teaches
that capital starved, but generally labour surplus developing countries, should
be the net importers of financial resources from advanced countries. This pattern of movement will be informed by
the returns on new investment opportunities, which are considered higher where
capital is limited (Oyeranti 2003:10).
Flows of funds in the opposite direction from individuals and business
organizations are considered perverse and exceptionable.
Financial resources enter into a country
through any of the followings:
• Foreign
direct investment, official flows from bilateral sources (eg. OPEC,
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development-OECD) and multilateral
sources (such as the World Bank, International Development Association-IDA,
International Monetary Fund-IMF, International Financial Corporation-IFC) on
concessional and non-concessional terms.
• Commercial
Bank Loans (excluding export credits)
All of these come in form of investment,
loans, grants or aids.
According to World Bank (1997), Foreign
Direct Investment is the investment made to acquire a lasting management
interest, usually at least 10% of voting stock, in an enterprise operating in a
country other than that of the investor.
International Monetary Fund‟s Balance of
Payments Manual defines foreign direct investment (FDI) “investment made to
acquire a lasting interest in foreign enterprises with the purpose of having an
effective voice in its management”. The
World Trade Organisation (1996) also observes that foreign direct investment
occurs when an investor based in one country (the home country) acquires an
asset in another country (the host country) with the intent to manage that
asset. The resultant capital relocation
will boost investment in the recipient country and according to Summers
(2000:16) brings enormous social benefits.
It is the process of investing, by foreigners, in the economy of another
country. These funds are generated
outside the investment recipient country.
FDI can be in form of build, operate and transfer (BOT), turn-key,
leveraged buy out, venture capital or starting a new company from the scratch.
Foreign direct investment is viewed as a
major stimulus to economic growth in developing countries. Its ability to deal
with major obstacles, namely, shortages of financial resources and technology,
skills acquisition and training, as well as contribution to corporate tax
revenue in the host country, has made it the centre of attention for
policy-makers in low-income countries in particular. However, only a few of
these countries have been successful in attracting significant FDI flows.
1.1 BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY
Nigeria, like other African countries,
recognizes the contribution of FDI to economic development and integration into
the world economy. Nigeria since
pre-independence era till date has being making considerable efforts to improve
its investment climate through liberation, deregulation, privatization and
enabling laws and incentives. Among
these are:
1. The
Aid to Pioneer Industries Ordinance and the Income
Tax (Amendment) Ordinance Act of 1952
2. Industrial
Development (Income Tax Releif) Act of 1958
3. Companies
Act of 1968, Banking Act of 1969, Petroleum
Act of 1969, etc
4. National
Office of Industrial Property Act 90 of 1979
5. Nigerian
Enterprises Promotion (Issues of Non-voting
Shares) Act 1987
6. The
Nigerian Enterprises Promotion Act No. 54 1989
7. Nigerian
Investment Promotion Commission, etc However, the much-expected surge in FDI
into Nigeria has not occurred. This is
particularly worrisome, as Nigeria possesses almost all the attributes of a
good FDI destination. These include size
of market, availability of natural resources, low labour cost and high
productivity, incentives, high level of human capital development, major
markets proximity, etc.
Nigeria needs FDI because it is favoured
over other forms of private capital flows. Portfolio equity and debt are
subject to reversals in financial crises period, while FDI is more resilient.
(Lipsey: 2001).2
FDI is critical to the country as it is
the key source of large pool of capital necessary for the development of the
country. However, despite several fiscal
incentives by the government, foreign direct investment has remained dismal
(The Punch 2002)
The cost of not having foreign direct investment is high. A decline in investment reduces the expansion
of output, variety and quality, leading to a reduced market share and
potentially declining non-price competitiveness.
Critical Appraisal of Foreign Direct Investment FDI in Nigeria
NB: The Complete Thesis is well written and ready to use.