Abstract:
Corruption is a persistent cancerous
phenomenon which bedevils Nigeria. Misappropriation, bribery, embezzlement,
nepotism, and money laundering by public officials have permeated the fabric of
the society. The office seekers of major political parties top the list of
unfit or corrupt officials. Elected officials in high echelons of power and
public officers use their positions to engage in corrupt activities. It is
estimated that corruption accounts for 20 percent of the GDP of Nigeria. For
several years, Nigeria has been at the bottom of Transparency International’s
(TI) Corrupt Perception Index (CPI) ranking. In 2002, the Nigerian government
created the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) to investigate and
prosecute cases of corruption and financial crimes. This paper reviews the
scope of corruption and the efforts by the Nigerian government to combat it by
examining the various perspectives for understanding the causes of corruption.
The study while recognizing the importance of the various perspectives, notes
that both the rent-seeking and institutional theories offer deeper insights
into the systemic nature of Nigerian corruption. Finally, the article examines
the activities of the EFCC and notes that it faces serious challenges as the
configurations of the Nigerian political landscape are uncertain.
Introduction
Corruption is a persistent cancerous
phenomenon which bedevils Nigeria. It has been acknowledged in many quarters
that corruption is Nigeria’s worst problem and is largely responsible for its
woes, such as the instability in the Niger Delta, the debt overhang, barriers
to democratic elections, and impediment to flow of foreign direct investment
(FDI).1 Nigeria is not significantly dissimilar to many developing countries:
corruption has been a multifaceted phenomenon characterizing the global
economy. Although most studies of corruption focus on developing countries,
there are few studies on corruptive practices, the role of the anti-corruption
agency, and the debilitating impact of corruption on Nigeria.2
There are a number of reasons for
focusing on the scope and impact of corruption in Nigeria and the difficulties
in dealing with it. Nigeria occupies a central place in Africa as the most
populous country, with an estimated population of over 149 million. It is one
of the continent’s richest countries and is blessed with a huge diversity of
natural and human resources. It is also characterized by a multiplicity of
different ethnic groups. Like many mono-cultural economies in Africa, its
economy is heavily dependent on crude oil. Paradoxically, it is this important
natural resource that sustains corruption in Nigeria. As in many African
states, corruption is a malaise that infects the society. Corruption drains
from African countries over $140 billion per year.3 Corruption deters
investment because it is a disincentive to potential investors; it distorts
public expenditure, increases the overheads for running businesses, and diverts
resources from poor to rich countries. According to Transparency International
(TI), corruption accounts for about 20 percent of its Gross Domestic Product
(GDP).4 Nigeria is also identified as among the top nations in the over $1
trillion annually paid globally in bribes.5 Corruption was partly responsible
for the collapse of the first (1960–66) and second (1979–83) republics. These
interesting facts make the choice and significance of Nigeria apt, especially
as it is one of the few countries in Africa that has taken a bold step to set
up an anticorruption agency to investigate and prosecute perpetrators of
corruption activities. Corruption in the form of misappropriation, bribery,
embezzlement, nepotism, and money laundering permeate Nigerian society. Over
the years, various administrations have articulated polices and measures
designed to combat corruption. Examples include General Murtala Muhammed’s
(1975–76) crusade to confiscate assets illegally acquired by Nigerians; Shehu
Shagari’s (October 1979– December 1983) ethical revolution to combat corruption
through the introduction of code of conduct for public servants; General
Muhammadu Buhari’s (December 1983– August 1985) war against indiscipline; and
General Ibrahim Babaginda’s (August 1985–August 1993) ethical and social
mobilization crusade. These efforts have been largely cosmetic attempts to
address a systemic problem that is deeply rooted in the country’s fabric. In
addition to these ethical schemes, there have been a number legislative acts
and functional mechanisms to combat corruption. Prominent among them include
the Banks and Other Financial Institutions Act (1991), the Financial
Malpractices in Banks Act (1994), the Advance Fee Fraud and Other Related
Offences Act (1995), the Nigerian Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences
Act (2000), and so forth. In its effort to fight corruption and create
credibility to attract international investments, the Obasanjo administration
(May 1999–May 2007) among other things, established the Economic and Financial
Crimes Commission (EFCC) in 2002. The EFCC is charged with wide ranging
responsibilities within the context of preventing, detecting, investigating,
and prosecuting cases of economic and financial crimes in Nigeria.
Chapters: 1 - 5
Delivery: Email
Number of Pages: 65
Price: 3000 NGN
In Stock

No comments:
Post a Comment
Add Comment