CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1
Background
to the Study
The
word ‘budget’ originated from a French word bougette
meaning little bag. In Britain, the word was used to describe the leather bag
in which the chancellor of the exchanger used to carry to the parliament. The
statement of government needs and sources as described by (1). After several
thoughts of consensus, the budget became the document contained in the bags
which represent plans of government expressed in money and submitted to
legislatives for approval.
Government
use budgets as a guiding tool for planning and control of its resources, be it
financial or otherwise, the use of budget involves knowing how much money you
earn and spend over a period, particularly one year. When a budget of an
establishment, department or ministry is created, it means creating a plan for
spending and saving money. The process of preparing budget requires a call
circular to the various departments, establishments, ministry or
representatives who are expected to participate in the budget discussion as
well as serve as budget committees. The person who heads the budget committee is
known as the budget director. The director heads the budget committee and
receives departmental or organisational submission for onward transmission to
the chairman for authentication and verification. On receipt of the budget
submission, the chairman is expected to go through the documents, make any
necessary adjustment, correction, medications, additions based on the mission
or corporate objectives, and then forward it to the legislative arm of the
council as a bill document.
The
legislative council reads the budget document carefully discuss every aspect of
it, make any amendment if any and send it to the executive for his consent and
authentication. Once the executive sign the document, it becomes a legal
document to be used for spending and control of money at any tier of
government.
The
aim of this study is to evaluate budget in the public sector from balanced
scorecard perspectives. Towards the purpose, the specific objectives of the
study are to investigate how budge performance differs from state to state in
Nigeria and to carry out a correlation appraisal surveyed states and response
obtained on budget performance of the selected state in Nigeria from years 2000
to 2010.
1.2
Statement
of the Study
Over
the years’ experience has shown that budgeting has proven ineffective in the
public sector as a result of the following problem that prompt the study of
these nature in order to find a lasting solution. This is to know whether the
problem is as a result of thus:
1.
Lack
of qualified and professional budget staff in the public sector organisation
2.
Whether
budgeting and budgetary control sustain an improved performance in public
sector.
3.
Whether
budgeted and actual figure are regularly or not compare for proper
accountability.
4.
Whether
the independent of the audit is encroached upon.
5.
Whether
the impediment enclave by mismanagement on resources pose great defect on the
sector.
1.3
The
Objectives of the Study
The
main objective of this study is to examine how the budgeting process sets the
overall goals of the government parastatals as well as the specific goal for
individual unit section and department. Other objectives include:
i.
Budgets
provide a means of coordinating the activities of the different departments of
an organisation so that each aspects of the operation is integrated and pulled
in the same direction.
ii.
Budgets
provide a means of communicating managements plans to all the staff involved.
iii.
A
budget also is a motivating device, with clearly delineated expected results.
For the budget period, employees know what is expected of them. This in turn
sustains morale and motivates people to work to attain the budgeted goals. The
budget of an organisation that employs participative budgeting involving all or
most personnel to formulate all or part of it often can further motivate
employees to attain the budgeted goals because the employees identify the
budget as their own (Blocher, et al. 2002:341).
iv.
The
budgeting process compels planning. The budgeting process forces managers to
decide in advance “what to do, how to do it, when to do it, and who is to do
it” without the necessity to prepare a budget. Many managers would spend all of
their time dealing with emergencies.
v.
Budgets
define foals and objectives that can serve as bench marks for evaluating the
performance of individual departments, divisions or the entire company.
1.4
Research
Question
This
seeks to address every important question on budgeting and budgetary control
techniques in government parastatals, as thus:
-
Does
budgeting and budgetary control sustain an improved performance in the public
sector? Yes or No
-
Are
there qualified and professional budget staff in public sector organisation?
Yes or No
-
Are
budget and actual figures regularly compared? Yes or No
-
Mismanagement
is one of the main sectors for the non implementation of budget provision in
government? Yes or No
-
Budget
assists in economic control and growth of government parastatal? Yes or No
1.5
Research
Hypothesis
The
following hypothesis was formulated to serve as guidelines for the researcher
for the purpose of this study.
-
There
are standard institutions responsible for budgeting and budgetary control and
monitoring system in government parastatals.
-
There
are adequate experience and professional staff to formulate and implement
government budgeting policies in Nigeria.
TOPIC: BUDGETING AND BUGETARY CONTROL TECHNIQUES IN GOVERNMENT PARASTATALS, A STUDY OF OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF GOVERNMENT TO THE FEDERATION
Chapters: 1 - 5
Delivery: Email
Delivery: Email
Number of Pages: 65
Price: 3000 NGN
In Stock

No comments:
Post a Comment
Add Comment