CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1
Background to the study
Microfinance
Bank (MFB) has evolved as an inclusive economic development approach intended
to benefit especially the poor and low-income, particularly those in the rural
areas where poverty appears to be entrenched and is deep rooted. This approach
is intended first to alleviate poverty in the short run and eradicate it to a
large extent in the long-run as provided for in the Millennium Development
Goals (MDGs) and Vision 20-2020 documents of the Federal Government of Nigeria.
MFB
refers to the provision of financial services to low-income clients or economic
active, including the self-employed and low-income earners in both urban and
rural areas. These clients are often traders, street vendors, small scale
farmers, service providers (hair dressers, rich Shaw drivers, etc), artisans
and small producers such as black smiths and seamstresses-entrepreneurs. These
groups of people enjoy small credit lines ranging from N5,000.00 to N200,000.00
Some MFBs provide insurance and payment service in addition to financial and
social international such as group formation, development of self-confidence,
financial literacy and management capabilities (Von Pischke, 1991).
To Von
Pischke (1991), MFB is not just banking, it is a development tool. Activities usually
involve: Non collateral loans typically for working capital, informal appraisal
of borrowers and investments, collateral substitutes, such as group guarantees
or compulsory savings, access to loans based on repayment performance,
streamlined loan disbursement, monitoring and secured saving products.
Authors
like Anyanwu (2004), Akinboyo (2007) and Snow (2004 indicate that the
operations of MFBs have grown phenomenally in the last decade in Nigeria,
driven largely by expanding informal sector activities and the reluctance of
conventional banks to serve the emerging micro enterprises. The studies also
revealed that the sub sector faces a lot of challenges which include
sustainability of government sponsored development financial schemes and policy
framework required to regulate and standardize its operation, accessing medium
to long term sustainable commercial sources of fund, increase mobilization of
savings, and shifting a good proportion of credit portfolio to the promotion of
real sector activities, especially in agriculture and manufacturing. These
challenges contributed to the growth of private in Nigeria (Anyanwu, 2004). The
core objectives of MFB therefore are to:
i.
Help very poor households meet basic
needs and protect them against risks.
ii.
Improve household economic welfare
and enterprise stability or growth.
iii.
Empower women, thus promoting
gender-equity and improving household well-being.
iv.
Eliminate economic dualism by
integrating the rural poor economy into the urban rich economy.
v.
Mobilize savings for intermediation
and create employment opportunities.
vi.
Provide financial literacy and
information for the uneducated and unskilled industry.
Even
though the number of poor and low income people that gain access to
microfinance services in Nigeria have grown between 25% and 30% annually over
the past four years (CBN, 2009), the demand for the services is largely unmet.
Estimate of the global demand ranges from 400 million to 500 million households
of which only around 30 million are reported to have access to sustainable
microfinance services (Snow, 2007). In Nigeria, 60% of the population is said
to be under-banked and are prospective customers of the microfinance
institutions (Dijk, 2010). This and other reasons have given rise to the
sporadic growth of MFBs in Nigeria.
To
achieve a robust economic development, the government initiated well-focused
programs to finance microenterprises on a sustainable basis. These were
intended to increase their access to credit and other financial service and as
such create wealth for the less privilege in the economy and reduce poverty.
Some of the programs included: Directorate of food, Roads and Rural
Infrastructure (DFRRI), Better life Rural Women, Family Support Programme,
Family Economic Advancement Programme (FEAP), National Directorate of
Employment (NDE), National Poverty Eradication Programme (NAPEP), People’s Bank
Community Bank and now the Microfinance Bank (Akinboyo, 2007).
The
operations of MFBs, in Nigeria have growth phenomenally in the recent past.
There is however fear that the number of beneficiaries of MFBs operators in an
insignificant proportion of over 60 people that are in need of microfinance
services (Anyanwu, 2004). Even where they are operated the practice and result
appears never in consonance with the propounded theories. There is thus, a
palpable fear in the midst of so many identified short comings in the
operations for the present rural development intervention effort in MFBs that
achieving its obligations is still a mirage. The on-going Central Bank of Nigeria
intervention in the operations of 224 microfinance banks is a further
confirmation that achieving the goal of microfinance banks in Nigeria is still
a desire very far from reality.
1.2
Statement of the Problem
Financial
services are the backbone of everyday economic activities. To stimulate
economic development, one of the essential conditions is a functional financial
system. Poor people need basic financial services to manage the little money
they have and depend on for day to day life. From the least developed to
emerging and developed economies, leaders, opinionates, policy formulators and
development professionals are promoting microfinance institutions as poverty
alleviation tools. It is been discovered as sustainable development formula for
the under banked and rural economy. The urban active poor and low-income are
also benefiting immensely from the concept which makes it an inclusive finance.
As stated
above, in Nigeria, several ranges of novel mechanisms were developed at
different times to provide financial aid to the rural poor especially micro
credit schemes (Akinboyo, 2007). It was discovered that most of these programs
could not last long enough to achieve desired results.
In this
dispensation, over 821 microfinance banks were licensed by CBN to provide the
total mix that will bring to the door steps of the hitherto unbankables
financial services (CBN, 2009). The effects of MFBs on poverty reduction in
Nigeria is yet to be ascertained as more than 57% of Nigeria are still living
below the poverty line (UNDP, 2007). Several posers come to mind at this
juncture: will there be another agony of yet a defunct scheme? Can MFBs create
opportunities? Redistribute income? And cause provision of basic human needs by
creating financial independence for targeted population? It is at least 6 years
that the law for the bank was made and it has witnessed ups and downs,
prompting the questions people are asking. The available literature on
microfinance bank has not bothered to review the effects of the scheme on poverty
reduction in Nigeria. This work is set out to fill such gaps in literature by
assessing the effects of MFBs on poverty reduction in Nigeria.
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
Cover page - - - - - - - - i
Declaration - - - - - - - - ii
Certification - - - - - - - - iii
Dedication - - - - - - - - iv
Acknowledgement - - - - - - v
Abstract - - - - - - - - - xi
Table of contents - - - - - - vii
List of tables - - - - - - - - x
CHAPTER
ONE: INTRODUCTION
1.1
Background of the study - - - - - 1
1.2
Statement of the problem - - - - - 6
1.3
Objectives of the study - - - - - 8
1.4
Research questions - - - - - 8
1.5
Research hypotheses - - - - - 9
1.6
Significance of the Study - - - - - 9
1.7
Scope of the study - - - - - - 10
1.8
Organization of the study - - - - - 10
CHAPTER
TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Introduction - - - - - - - 12
2.2 An overview of microfinance bank in Nigeria - 12
2.3 Social capital and informal finance groups - 24
2.4 Microfinance as a rural development and
poverty reduction intervention - - - - 28
2.5 Development finance institutions and
microfinance in Nigeria - - - - - 32
2.6 Microfinance poverty alleviation in Nigeria - - 35
2.7 Microfinance bank policy, regulatory and
supervisory framework - - - - - 41
2.8 Microfinance bank as an institution
development opportunity - - - - - 46
2.9 Microfinance bank and inclusive finance - - 49
2.10 Review of Empirical Studies - - - - 54
CHAPTER
THREE: METHODOLOGY
3.1 Introduction - - - - - - - 61
3.2 Research Design - - - - - - 61
3.3 Population of the Study - - - - - 62
3.4 Sample size of the Study - - - - - 62
3.5 Sources of Data Collection - - - - 62
3.6 Data Analysis Techniques - - - - - 63
3.7 Model Specification - - - - - - 64
3.8 Limitations of the methodology - - - - 66
CHAPTER
FOUR: DATA PRESENTATION, RESULT AND DISCUSSION
4.1 Introduction - - - - - - - 68
4.2 Data Presentation and Analysis - - - - 69
4.3 Test of Hypotheses - - - - - - 80
4.4 Discussion and Interpretation of Results - - 82
CHAPTER
FIVE: SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 Introduction - - - - - - - 86
5.2 Summary of Findings - - - - - 86
5.3 Conclusion - - - - - - - 87
5.4 Recommendations of the Study - - - - 88
5.5 Limitations of the Study - - - - - 90
5.6 Suggestion for Future Research - - - 91
Bibliography - - - - - - - 92
Appendices - - - - - - - 97
TOPIC: AN ASSESSMENT OF THE PERFORMANCE OF MICRO FINANCING BANK IN POVERTY REDUCTION IN NIGERIA
Chapters: 1 - 5
Delivery: Email
Delivery: Email
Number of Pages: 65
Price: 3000 NGN
In Stock

No comments:
Post a Comment
Add Comment