ABSTRACT
Without much ado, Africa has evolved
as the epicenter of the 21st century scramble. And this is so since the major
powers, particularly China and the US scrambled for African units in order to
securitize their oil and gas resources intake. Although the US has discovered
and is presently exploiting shale oil within its confines; however, it still
forms part of the neo-scramblers for several African units, especially because
of the large market and their being festooned with cornucopia of several other
mineral resources which are necessary for the sustenance of the dimension of development
being witnessed globally in the present. Against this backdrop, existing
literature have demonstrated that African units – especially the oil producing
states- would enjoy a win-win relationship with the extra-African powers.
Without disregard for existing views on the benefits that would accrue to
African countries, especially Angola, in the ongoing extra-regional
powers-African relationships, this study seeks to demonstrate that the ongoing
relationships, oily one particularly, between Angola and China and the US
consist of some negative contents, some of which are presently manifesting. In
the bid to achieve this research goal, this study adopts both primary and
secondary sources of data gathering.
CHAPTER ONE
1.1 BACKGROUND
The scramble for Africa can be
explained according to historical documents as a period of rapid colonization
of territories and this is in line with the belief that man is a political
animal that will continue to struggle for survival; hence the survival of the
fittest. Having noted that, it is therefore understandable to a large extent
the reason why states in the international system sought to expand their
territories which in turn led to the scramble. The scramble is colonization for
three basic reasons; political, economic and religious expansion. Africa has
been and is still the ground for international exploits and this has affected
the economy of nations within it for ill or good. States that possess the power
in the International system have maintained their positions through the level
of influence they possess in the international system. This is done through
influencing of various political leaders and in turn the affairs of their
various states in other to achieve their personal interest. This however, has
led to anarchy in the international system as there is the expression of
Egotism and ‗flexing of muscles‘. States display this by use of Power Politics.
On the other hand, the contemporary
international system is different from what it used to be. States are a lot
more liberal in their relationship with other states because there is now the
presence of International Institutions guiding the conduct of state relations
so as to prevent the outbreak of war (although this was unsuccessful twice in
1914 and 1939).
Based on the foregoing, it can be
assumed that Africa has always been under the control of the superpowers and
has been used as a pawn in the hands of the bigger states. The new scramble for
Africa manifested much more in the 21st century and has been aided by the era
of globalization. Africa has been and is still struggling to catch up with the
pace of development and modern technology of the modern age. Take, for example
the fact that most of the African states do not fully understand the concept of
liberal democracy and are still having to cope with incidents of civil war .A
good example is the subject of this project, Angola. The country is known to
have suffered major civil unrest since its independence. However in recent
times, it is known to be one of the oil producing countries to reckon with. As
at 2008, Angola was said to be the fifth largest supplier of oil to U.S. (two
places above Nigeria) also it became the largest exporter of oil to China
(taking the place of Saudi Arabia). The relationship between Angola‘s oil
production and its internal crisis is based on the role of transnational oil
corporations.
Angola has therefore been vulnerable
to the super powers in the international system because it does not fully
understand what it is to be a war free state. However, most states in the
international system had not only gained independence years ago, but have grown
to become better states based on the evolution of the international system.
China‘s relations with Angola began politically during the era of anti-colonial
struggle when it supported three liberation movements; FNLA (National Front for
the liberation of Angola), MPLA (Popular Movement for the liberation of Angola)
and UNITA (National Union for the Total Independence of Angola). These
relations were however defined by the cold war era. Up until 1960s when the
UNITA and FNLA became the only two recognized liberation movements, China
mainly supported the MPLA. After the recognition of the two liberation groups
China reduced, perhaps even totally withdrew, all support from the MPLA.
Attention and resources were focused on the two recognized groups (Corkin,
2011).
After Angola gained its independence,
China refused to acknowledge its independence, however, relations between the two
countries only improved in the 1990s. it can be said that China‘s relations
with Angola was only a military and security based one until after the crisis
in 2002 when it shifted to an economic relationship. On March 4th 2004, china
granted loan to Angola worth two billion dollars for reforming its damaged
infrastructure. That move by the Chinese government is said to have
strengthened the bilateral ties between the two countries and has led to the
signing of various diplomatic treaties. It has also led to the creation of
embassies both in China from Angola and otherwise. Also in 2007, china granted
and oil backed loan to Angola in order for the country.
1.2STATEMENT OF PROBLEM
Against the backdrop of the Africa
becoming the epicenter of the scramble for oil and some other mineral
resources, several studies have been conducted into how the 21st century
scramble affects the continent and its units, particularly the oil producing
countries, Angola inclusive. This majorly, has been on the basis of the implications
that the presence and interests of the major powers would have on the continent
and some of its units. However, there has been scanty literature on how the
presence of China and the United States, two important players in the
neo-scramble for Africa, in Angola impacts on the country; hence this study. As
such, this study seeks to demonstrate the grave implications that the
politico-economic dimension of the US and China‘s scramble for oil and gas
resources in Angola might have on the country.
1.3 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
The specific objectives of the study
are to:
1. examine the growing importance of
the continent to national, regional and global security;
2. identify the complex issues
involved in the international politics of oil in Angola; and to
3. analyze the politico-economic and
security implications engendered by the different American and Chinese
interests and presence in Angola for the country.
TOPIC: THE POLITICS OF OIL IN THE NEW SCRAMBLE FOR AFRICA UNITED STATES AND CHINA IN ANGOLA
Chapters: 1 - 5
Delivery: Email
Delivery: Email
Number of Pages: 68
Price: 3000 NGN
In Stock

No comments:
Post a Comment
Add Comment