CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1
Background to the Study
Whenever we think of war, it is easy
to imagine the involvement of soldiers and the presence of guns, tanks weapons
of mass destruction etc. and a chaotic war situation. In another stead, when we
think of trade transactions, exchange rates, currency and currency policies, it
becomes difficult to think of war because they are instruments of economics.
But in a situation whereby countries use currency as weapons during conflict,
it is referred to as „Currency war‟. The term “currency war” was coined in September
2010 by the then Brazilian Finance minister Guido Mantega, who first raised the
eyebrow of the public about the currency war. It is a new terminology that is
used in place of “competitive devaluation” of international currencies.
According to general economic studies, competitive devaluation refers to a
condition in international affairs where countries compete against each other
to achieve relatively low exchange rates for their respective currencies, as
the price to buy a particular currency falls so does the real price of exports
from that country (Burda and Wyplosz, 2005). Although imports become more
expensive, the domestic industry as well as local employment receives a great
boost as a result of preference of the citizens for locally produced goods
(Brown, 2010). However, consistent devaluation of currency on the long run
could harm the purchasing power of the citizens and could provoke and trigger
retaliatory action by other countries which in turn can lead to a general
decline in international trade thereby harming all countries. Basically, in competitive
devaluation, a country only gains temporary advantage until the next country
devalues its currency exchange rate as well.
In the past, competitive devaluation
has been rare throughout most of history because countries have generally
adhered to maintaining a relatively high value for their currencies (Cooper,
1971:3). It was rare for governments to intentionally devalue their currencies.
Even for countries with low levels of unemployment, it was more common to
consider a strong currency as the rational choice. However, in the 1930s,
currency war broke out during the great depression, when countries abandoned
the use of Gold standard for exchange rate and preferred to use devaluation in
pushing up their economies by competing and exporting unemployment to their
trading partner countries, the concept which was then known and referred to as
“Beggar thy Neighbor” (Rothermund, 1996: 6-7). Beggar thy neighbor is seen as
an economic policy in which one country attempts to remedy its economic
problems by means that tend to worsen the economic problems of other countries.
Since devaluation effectively increased unemployment overseas, the trading
partner countries equally retaliated with their own devaluations which in turn
led to reduction in overall international trade.
Some economist observers have however
argued that the China‟s intentional or unintentional maintenance of the value
of the Yuan was traceable to the Asian crisis of 1997 during which the foreign
reserves of the Asian economies ran seriously low and led them to accept low
prices for their commodities, assets and to also receive harsh terms by the IMF
(Accominotti, 2011). The free market had failed the Asians, implying that they
had to seek solution by keeping the value of their currencies low (Wolf, 2009:
31-39). The strategy encouraged export-led growth and at the same time built up
the Asians foreign exchange reserves in protective anticipation of any future
crisis. It argued that the currency war did not exist at this point because the
advanced economies, such as the United States, were happy and contented with
the strategy because the strategy benefited their citizens who were able to
purchase cheap imports of high material from Asia and enjoy high standard of
living (Reinhart, 2010: 208-212). This advantage made the United States
partially oblivious to the fact that their current account deficit was growing
at a substantial pace, because the collective view of the U.S free market
economists and policy makers like the then Chairman of the Federal Reserve Alan
Greenspan and US Treasury Secretary until 2007 was that deficit was not a major
problem to worry about (Roubini, 2004).
Although there had been some voiced
complaints in 2005 by the United States Trade Union along with US executives
and officials at the intermediate level about perceived unfair trade actions by
China, the international economy was then still in good shape, China abandoned
the currency peg (fixed exchange rate system), allowed its currency (Yuan) to
appreciate substantially and at the same time increase its exports until 2007.
In 2007, financial crises began to reduce China‟s export orders as such the
dollar peg was re-established. This is what Economists like Michael P. Dooley,
Peter M. Garber and David Folkerts-Landau described the relationship between
the US and the emerging economies as the Bretton woods II. The period from the
end of the 2nd world war until about 1971 was known as Bretton Woods. This was
characterized by a system of semi-fixed exchange rates which meant that
competitive devaluation was not an option, which was one of the design
objectives of its creators. In addition, global economic growth was generally
high in this period thereby removing any incentive for currency war even if it
had been possible (Ravenhill, 2005). Thus with the re-establishment of China‟s
currency peg, there is the assumption of a currency war that will exist between
the United States and China, with implications on global economy.
1.2 Statement of Problem
The United States of America – China
economic relationship is entangled in the currency issue and trade balance
between the two countries. China‟s path-breaking reforms have successfully
transformed them from a poor closed nation to a state to be reckoned with
economically. The rapid rise of the Chinese economy in recent years is creating
opportunities for many and causing increasing trade disputes with its major
trading partner; United States. China is being accused of using protectionist
policies by constantly maintaining an undervalued exchange rate to boost her
competitive advantage in the international market and also accumulating its
foreign exchange reserves at the detriment of the United States. The United
States have expressed considerable concern that by undervaluing its currency,
China is gaining an unfair advantage and has seriously crippled their
manufacturing sector.
The United States in turn is using
policies like Quantitative easing by printing and injecting money into the
domestic economy through market operations. The newly injected money is
possibly destroyed after the economy becomes better in order to prevent
inflation. Although the United States administration denied that the purpose of
implementing quantitative easing was not to devalue the dollar, the policy can
act as medium of devaluing a country‟s currency (Mackintosh, 2010).
Subsequently, it has become a competition about who has the lesser value for
her currency which invariably leading to currency war. In the same vein, just
like during the great depression of the 1930‟s, it could lead to the general
decline of international trade because a currency war between the two largest
economies can and will affect the economy of other nations within the
international system. It is then against this backdrop, that this study seeks
to examine the issue of currency war between China and United States and the
major implications on the global economy.
1.3 Objective of Study:
To examine the issue of currency war
between China and USA.
To identify the causes of the
currency war between China and USA.
To analyze the implications of the
currency war between USA and China on both countries.
To analyze the implication of
currency war on global economy.
1.4 Research Questions:
What is currency war? And how does
it exist between China and USA?
What are the causes of the currency
war between China and USA?
To what extent has the currency war
affected China and USA?
To what extent has the currency war
affected the global economy as a whole?
TOPIC: CURRENCY WAR BETWEEN CHINA AND USA AND ITS IMPACT ON GLOBAL ECONOMY
Format: MS Word
Chapters: 1 - 5
Delivery: Email
Delivery: Email
Number of Pages: 40
Price: 3000 NGN
In Stock

No comments:
Post a Comment
Add Comment