CHAPTER ONE
1.1
BACKGROUND TO THE STUDY
Crime is a social canker-worm that has
eaten deep into the social fabric of the Nigerian society such that its effect
is multifaceted (Chinwokwu, 2013). Although Durkheim (2007) opines that crime
is inevitable and normal aspect of social life, it is an integral part of all
healthy societies. Haralambos & Holborn (2008) state that the functionality
of crime in a society, such as ours, has to be viewed seriously because of the
social and psychological problems it has caused many victims. In fact, no
matter the functionality of crime in the society, the act of crime is
condemnable and unacceptable in a healthy society, no matter the justification
criminals may present.
It is a paradox that Nigeria is a rich
country inhabited by the poor. Her poverty profile in statistical figures
according to a recent study indicates that Nigerian people live in one of the
twenty poorest countries in the world. The trend in poverty is on the decline.
The proportion of population living in relative poverty reduced to 54%. Data
also shows that the proportion of population living in extreme poverty was 35%
while the percentage of underweight children was 30% (Ladan, 2010).
The proportion of the population
living in relative poverty was expected to have fallen to 28.78 per cent in
2007, if the MDG target is to be met in 2015. However, among every ten
Nigerians, five were still living in poverty in 2007. Analysis of poverty
incidence by sectors indicated that poverty was more pronounced in the rural
areas than in the urban. Similarly, while poverty was more pronounced among
farmers and larger households headed by persons with lower levels of education,
income inequality is more pronounced in urban centres. Unemployment rate in
Nigeria rose from about 12 out of 100 working age people in 1999 to 18 in 2005
with the rate of youth unemployment rising in urban than rural areas. The various
Federal Government Initiatives on poverty reduction, food security, respect for
the Rule of Law, balanced socio-economic development and the various safety
nets of government created relatively better supportive policy environment
(Ladan, 2010).
The growing awareness and recognition
on the part of African governments, donor agencies/development partners and
Civil Society Groups, that poor people, particularly women and children, the
powerless and the disadvantaged, are the most vulnerable to all forms of crime and
discrimination; and that in very many cases, formal justice systems fail to
protect them, is a step in the right direction. This has recently necessitated
the need for African governments (Nigeria inclusive) to develop the capacity to
ensure safety, security and access to justice for all. The importance of
justice systems for improving the lives of vulnerable groups/poor people by
ensuring that everybody has access to systems which dispense justice fairly,
speedily and without discrimination cannot be over-emphasized.
Failure of states to provide citizens
with protection from crime and access to justice impedes sustainable
development. All people have a right to go about their lives in peace, free to
make the most of their opportunities. They can only do so if the institutions
of justice and law and order protect them in their daily lives. States with
poorly functioning legal systems and poor crime control mechanisms are
unattractive to investors, so economic growth also suffers.
Accordingly, this paper contends that
in developing countries like Nigeria the law is often discriminatory and legal
processes are expensive, slow and complex. The result is that people, and
particularly poor and disadvantaged people, have inadequate and unequal access
to justice through the formal legal system. For these reasons they tend to rely
much more on Customary Justice Systems, but these can be discriminatory.
Improving access to justice requires that both formal and customary systems be
made to work justly and equitably. It also means more than reforming legal
procedures. It can also mean law reform, making courts more user friendly,
improving Customary Systems and improving the treatment of offenders.
Since the 1970s, the popular crimes
that were prevalent in Nigeria include: armed robbery, stealing, assault,
burglary, rape, etc; but today terrorism, bomb blasts, kidnapping, drug
trafficking, money laundry, child trafficking, assassinations and other
criminal activities have become the order of the day. Ekhomu (2010) noted that
Nigeria was beset with myraid of security challenges such as kidnapping,
terrorism, civil disturbance, political violence, fraud, assassination, armed
robbery, among others. In spite of stringent laws and punishments to check
these crimes, they have continued to be on the increase with the police
seemingly helpless and incapable of savaging the situation (Utebor & Ekpimah,
2010).
It has to be recalled that in 1986
Dele Giwa, a founding editor of the News watch Magazine was killed during
General Ibrahim Babangida‘s government through a parcel bomb (Oyeniyi, 2007),
the first of its kind in Nigerian history. Reacting to the assassination of
Dina Dipo, an Action Congress Gubernatorial candidate for Ogun Statein 2007,
Yinka Odumakin, National Publicity Secretary of the Party; described Dina‘s
murder as a shame to the country. He went on to say that Dina has now joined
the league of Bola Ige, Ayo Daramola, Funso Williams and so many other
non-prominent people who lost their lives since the inception of do-or-die
politics. One common thread in all these assassination is the inability of the
police to bring to book the perpetrators (Akintunde, 2010).
However, the general insecurity and
fear of victimisation and the seemingly inability of some state governments to
describe the type of arms and ammunition at the disposal of the criminals,
indicate that the professionalism of the criminals are beyond the capabilities
of the states (Chidozie, 2010). This came at the heels of upsurge of armed
robberies, kidnappings and other violence in the cities of some states,
including Abia, Bayelsa, Delta, Edo, Imo and Lagos in Nigeria. It is important
to note that between 1996 – 2003, a total of about 800,054 cases of property
crimes were recorded by the Nigeria police (Dambazau, 2007; Ugwoke, 2010).The
magnitude of these crimes and the modus operandi of the criminals seem to put
the police off-balance.
The former Inspector General of
Police, Mr. Ogbonnaya Onovo, told his officers and men in Owerri, Imo Stateat
the peak of the kidnapping saga in the South East Zones of Nigeria that they
have done well in maintaining peace and order, but have failed in preventing
crimes (Akasike & Abimbola, 2010). This was further emphasized by the
immediate past Inspector General of Police Mr. Hafiz Ringim who blamed the
incessant armed robbery, kidnapping, and similar crimes on policemen‘s corrupt
practices (Akasike & Abimbola, 2010). These raise a lot of questions on
police efficiency and effectiveness in handling criminal investigation matters
in Nigeria.
It is pertinent to mention that the
level at which crime is prevented in the society will very much depend on the
level at which the police are able to investigate, prosecute and gain
conviction of criminals (Chinwokwu, 2013). It is because of their importance
and position in the criminal justice system that they have been chosen for this
study. Moreover, Gibbons (1968) contends that crime is a social phenomenon, as
a social phenomenon, the methods or ways of investigating the commission of
crime needs to be studied in our social settings. The Police are charged with
the responsibility of internal security by ensuring safety of lives and
property. But the question here is: have the police been able to carry out
their functions effectively and efficiently?
1.2 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM
The steady increase of crimes and
undetected crimes of various criminal activities recently has raised a general
feeling of insecurity of lives and property among Nigerians. United Nations
report in 1993 stated that for every 100 Nigerians, 40 are criminals (Arinze,
2010). According to Arinze (2010), whether the report is accurate or not, the
problem of eradicating crime in Nigeria in the 1970s, 1980s, 1990s and 2000s
was a big task for the police, as it was years criminals of all shades emerged
in Nigerian towns and cities in full force and threatened the peace and
economic life of many citizens.
Between 1996 - 2000, the police
recorded a total of 1,072,026 cases. Out of this, 462,058 or 43.1 percent of
the cases were prosecuted while 540,899 or 50.5 percent cases were
under-investigation, undetected or unsolved (Soyombo, 2005). The implication of
this is that a very significant whooping number of 51.0 percent of the cases
were under-investigation or undetected or even closed for want of evidence.
This is very bad for a police
organization that is supposed to be efficient. It is an indication that
criminal justice system in the country is very weak. For instance, in 2008
alone a total of 90,156 cases were recorded by the police. Out of these cases,
51,816 or 57.5 percent were prosecuted and 23,589 or 45.5 percent cases were
convicted. This is a very significant improvement in the prosecuting capacity
and ability of the police and a welcome development. However, we have to note
also that of the number of cases prosecuted, a total of 3,705 or15.7 percent
were discharged and acquitted. This also dwarfs the improvement made on
conviction, because the 6
significant number discharged and
acquitted is not unconnected to improper investigation. More so, 38,342 or42.5
percent remained ‗under-investigation, undetected or unsolved‘. This is very
significant in police performance. Significant also was the number of property
lost. Out of 5,257,710,145 lost only 2,014,425,676 or 38.3 percent was
recovered.
From the above illustrations, it is
obvious that the police performance in terms of investigation and detection or
clearance rate have been inefficient as evidenced by the overwhelming cases
that remained under-investigation, undetected, unsolved or even discharged and
acquitted. This apparent inefficiency of the Nigeria Police to combat crime in
the society through effective management of criminal investigation is a serious
setback in the criminal justice system. This is because the police is the pivot
on which the justice system stands (Conklin, 1989). The challenges confronting
the police in Nigeria are corruption, lack of sufficient finance, lack of
public support, etc. (Dambo, 2012). Hence the police ineffectiveness in
controlling crime through effective criminal investigation techniques has been
so glaring that people now live in fear i.e. fear of being victims of criminal
violence. The socio-psychological effect this fear has generated on the people
is better imagined than said.
1.3 RESEARCH QUESTIONS
In line with the statement of problem
above, the study will seek answers to the following questions:
1. What are the factors responsible
for the high rate of undetected and pending criminal investigation cases in
Nigeria?
2. What are the investigative
techniques adopted by investigating police officers in criminal investigation?
7
3. How effective are the investigative
techniques used by the Nigeria Police Force in combating crime?
4. What are the challenges confronting
the police in combating crime?
1.4 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
This study is on criminal justice
system: a case study of Nigeria‘s Police Force in combating crime. However,
based on the research questions stated above, this study seeks to realize the
following objectives:
1. To determine the factors that are
responsible for the high rate of undetected and pending criminal investigation
cases in Nigeria.
2. To examine the investigative
techniques adopted by investigating police officers in criminal investigation.
3. To assess the effectiveness of the
investigative techniques used by the Nigeria Police Force in combating crime.
4. To enumerate the challenges
confronting the police in combating crime.
5. To conclude with viable policy
options for Nigeria Police Force to efficiently combat crime in the country.
TOPIC: CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM: A CASE STUDY OF THE NIGERIAN POLICE FORCE IN COMBATING CRIME
Format: MS Word
Chapters: 1 - 5
Delivery: Email
Delivery: Email
Number of Pages: 95
Price: 3000 NGN
In Stock

No comments:
Post a Comment
Add Comment