Latest

whatsapp (+234)07060722008
email sales@graciousnaija.com graciousnaija@gmail.com

Wednesday, 28 October 2020

EFFECT OF AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARACTERISTICS ON FINANCIAL REPORTING QUALITY OF LISTED DEPOSIT MONEY BANKS IN NIGERIA

EFFECT OF AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARACTERISTICS ON FINANCIAL REPORTING QUALITY OF LISTED DEPOSIT MONEY BANKS IN NIGERIA

CHAPTER ONE

INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background to the Study

Corporate financial report provides fundamental information to a wide range of groups; its main purpose is to provide information which is supposed to give a true and fair view of the management’s stewardship, company’s performance and financial position for the various users of the information to make informed economic decisions (America Accounting Association, 1961). Financial reporting is the process by which corporate entities provide interested parties (users) with information on their transactions during an accounting period (Mbobo & Ekpo, 2016). Among the interested parties are shareholders, creditors, tax authorities, customers, financial analysts, and lenders. The parties need quality financial reports for economic decision making. Financial report is one of the major means that corporate management uses in communicating financial information for a given period. In this regard, the International Accounting Standard (IAS 1) states that the purpose of financial reporting is to provide information about the financial position, financial performance and cash flows of an entity that is useful to a wide range of users in making economic decisions. Such information is communicated through financial statements. Ibadin and Dabor (2015) stated that financial statements show the results of the management’s stewardship of the resources entrusted to it by revealing economic information on assets, liabilities, equity, income and expenses, including gains and losses; contributions by and distributions to owners in their capacity as owners; and cash flows. Such information, along with other information in the notes, assists users of financial statements in predicting the entity’s future cash flows and, in particular, their timing. Moreover, accounting information contained in the financial statements is one of the very essential information needed by various stakeholders especially investors for making informed economic decisions. Investors in search of investment avenues use the accounting information contained in the financial statements of the intended investing company in pricing of shares. Market participants seek high-quality financial reporting or information to mitigate information asymmetry as such quality information should be a pre-requisite for a well-functioning capital market. Thus, companies that provide high-quality information have an added advantage in their rating in the capital market (Ibadin & Dabor, 2015). The increasing demand for quality financial reporting creates the need for effective and efficient monitoring mechanisms. This is necessitated by the conflict of interest between managers, who serve as agents and resource holders, who serve as principals, wherein, managers carry out activities that are counter-productive in the realization of the interests of resource holders. Therefore, board of directors is instituted to monitor the activities of managers. The board sets several monitoring measures that will ensure the integrity of management’s decision. One of committees is the audit committee. The quality of the monitoring process depends on effectiveness of the audit committee. The effectiveness of audit committee in exercising its monitoring role is defined as the extent to which they perform their duties which is associated with their characteristics (Dechow, Sloan & Sweeney, 1996; Beasley, 1996; Carcello & Neal, 2000; Klein, 2002). An effective audit committee ensures the provision of credible accounting information to financial statement users by constraining earnings management by managers (Dandago & Rufai, 2014). It is in line with increasing loss of credibility of financial reports that the banking industry, through the Central Bank of Nigeria also developed its code, the recent of which is the CBN Code of Corporate Governance of 2006 (Ibadin & Dabor, 2015). Specifically, the code requires that companies should establish audit committees consisting of directors and shareholders. Under the code, audit committee is saddled with the responsibility of reviewing the scope and result of audit, the independence and objectivity of the auditor, among others. In spite of this, the quality of financial reports of banks has continued to be an issue of concern. Consequently, the effect of audit committee characteristics on financial reporting quality has been under scrutiny. Audit committee independence is one of such characteristics (Klein, 2002). This is measured by presence of non-executive audit committee members who do not engage in the day to day running of firms. Presence of such members provides a necessary condition for the audit committee to carry out its oversight functions objectively. However, a contrary argument to this is that non-executive audit committee members might not have requisite knowledge of the internal financial reporting practices of an organization and therefore might not be able to ascertain possible areas of financial misstatements. Nonetheless, lack of audit committee independence in Nigerian may have influence in the increasing spate of financial scandals and bank failures. Frequency of audit committee meeting is also considered relevant for the oversight functions of the audit committee (Jenkins, 2000). Menon and Williams (1994) contend that the more often an audit committee meets the more active it is being perceived, which leads to fewer financial reporting problems. In practice, more frequent audit committee meeting gives the committee opportunity to critically examine financial statements and carry out follow-up actions. Similarly, Audit committee that meets frequently can reduce the incidence of financial reporting problems. Therefore, the more frequent the audit committee members meet, the more thorough they are prone to be in terms of assessing the quality of financial report. Contrary to this analogy, it can be argued that frequent audit meetings add cost to the organization. Payment of meeting allowances constitute cost which often times can be avoided. Managers even use such avenues to expropriate organizational resources. In the deposit money banks in Nigeria, the issue of frequency of audit committee meeting is worthy of emphasis especially in the light of increasing loss of credibility in the financial reports presented by management of banks whose financial reports are not well reviewed by the audit committees that meet rarely (Dabor & Dabor, 2015). The existence of female board members could serve as a mitigating factor against manipulative accounting as there is bound to be less collusion. Relatedly, audit committee members with requisite financial expertise are prone to be more active in assessing the quality of financial reports. However, a contrary argument is that such members might rather aid management in manipulating accounts especially if their independence is compromised (Illaboya, 2012). Therefore, the role of the audit committee in monitoring the financial misstatements to ensure financial reporting quality cannot be overemphasized.

 Format: MS Word

Chapters: 1 - 5, Preliminary Pages, Abstract, References
Delivery: Email
No. of Pages: 115

NB: The Complete Thesis is well written and ready to use. 

Price: 10,000 NGN
In Stock
Masters Project Topics in Accounting and Finance



No comments:

Post a comment

Add Comment