CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background to the Study
The performance of the agricultural
sector in developing countries is important to fight food security and poverty
reduction efforts since a large number of poor people live in rural areas and
they depend on agriculture for their economic activities. They are also the
source of food for the urban populace and the supplier of raw materials for
industries. In developed countries; small agricultural producers are
entrepreneurs, traders, investors, and manufacturers (Gashayie & Singh,
2015). In all these roles, small agricultural households constantly seek to use
available financial instruments to improve their performance and secure the
best possible investment choices. In many African countries including Nigeria,
the agricultural sector is dominated by small holder farmers. They engage in
subsistence agriculture and accounts for more than 90% of the nation‟s
agricultural output; they cultivate less than 2 hectares of farm land (World
Bank, 2008 in Kuye, 2015).
Rice is the most strategic food crop in
West Africa because of its contribution to food security of the populations and
its impact on the economy of households and countries (AkwaaSeck, 2013; FAO,
2011). Rice farming is predominately done by small holder farmers across
Nigeria in small production quantity that usually lack financial capacity to
produce in larger quantity. Indeed, studies have shown that financial services
play a crucial role in agricultural production (Honlonkou, Acclassato, &
Kokou, 2005; Simtowe, Diagne, & Zeller, 2009; Asfaw, Kassie, Simtowe, &
Lipper 2012). However, Small holder farmers have continued to face inadequate
access to financial services, and where these services are made available, they
are often at very 1 2 high cost (Philip, Nkonya, Pender & Oni 2009; Okojie,
Monye, Eghafona, Osaghae & Ehiakhamen 2010). According to Abebe (2005) the
lack of financial resources tailored for small holder farming has limited their
capacity to produce. This has led to high food import bills, lingering food
insecurity, escalating social vices of insustainability of the national
resource base (Mbah, 2001). According to Jirgi, Usman, Tanko and Ibrahim
(2007), Nigeria government has initiated more encompassing credit and non-credit
programs for small holder rice farmers. For instance, the Presidential
Initiative on Increased Rice Production, the Nigerian National Rice Development
Strategy. However, despite agricultural schemes introduced by the government in
the country in a bid to boost rice production, this dream has remained elusive
(Okoronkwo & Anozie 2007). Small holder rice farmers still lack proper
financial and non financial facilities to increase their performance in terms
of output in yield, farm profit, income, growth and standard of living. The
inadequacy to meet the country‟s rice consumption demand has created a huge
demand supply problem (Monitoring African Food and Agriculture Policy, 2013).
The consumption of rice in Nigeria has grown rapidly over the past decade.
According to Nkwazema (2016), Nigeria consumes 7 million metric tonnes of rice
annually. More so, only 2.7 million metric tonnes is produced by farmers
annually in Nigeria, which leaves a supply demand gap of 4.3 million metric
tonnes to be cushioned by importing (Nkwazema 2016). Nigeria has a 49
percentage self sufficiency ratio (Monitoring African Food and Agriculture
Policy, 2013). Rice is the most consumed staple food by Nigeria‟s over 174
million people across states and geo-political zones (Terungwa & Yuguda,
2014). At this rate per capita consumption rate of rice is 27 killogrammes per
year at 460 dollars per metric tonnes. This has lead to increase in rice
importation annually to fill demand gap which arose as the inability of rice
farmers to meet 3 demand. Studies have shown that formal financial institutions
located in rural areas for small farmers help increase agricultural production
(Myer, 2007; Ayegba & Ikani, 2013).
Providing cheap financial service to
poor small holder farmers through microfinance institutions (MFIs) has been
considered as a tool for improving the performance of small holder farmers.
MFIs provide small amount of financial capital to certain target groups with a
loose condition (Bhatt & Tang 2002). MFIs also provide various
complementary programs, including training and guidance, entrepreneurship and
self-motivation for the development of the target cooperative groups through
economic activity (McKernan, 2002). There is a renewed interest, from MFIs in
cooperative producer organizations as an institutional vehicle to improve small
holder agricultural performance (Bernard & Spielman, 2009; Fischer &
Qaim, 2012a; 2012b).Cooperative producer are beneficial to small holder farmers
by reducing transaction costs in input and output markets and improving
bargaining power vis-à-vis buyers (Markelova, Meinzen-Dick, Hellin, Dohrn 2009;
Bernard & Taffesse, 2012). When small holder farmers organize themselves in
cooperatives, they gain group access to microcredit and other financial services
and engage them in entrepreneurial activities. Microcredit as a financial
service may enable small marginal farmers purchase inputs like fertilizers,
pesticides, tractors among others they need to improve their performance as
well as financing a range of activities adding value to agricultural products
(Menon, Noonari, Sharh, Peerzado, Panhwar, Sethar, Kalwar, Bhatti & Jamro
2015). Microcredit availability encourages diversified agriculture which
stabilizes and increases size of farm operations and resource productivity
(Odiase 2004). 4 Access to savings facilities also plays a key part in allowing
small farmers smoothen their consumption expenditures and in financing
investments which improves their performance. Small holder farmers usually
depend on seasonal rainfall for plantations. The vagaries of weather sometimes
make them loose their crops before harvesting. Microsavings usually serve as
insurance cover for small farmers as they could plough back their savings into
their farm in case of natural disasters. Entrepreneurial Skills means knowledge
in practice. It refers to the practical application of knowledge in performing
function. It offers opportunity to learn basic skills related to earning,
spending, budgeting, saving, risk taking, innovativeness and borrowing (Cohen
& Sebstad, 2003).
1.2 Statement of the Problem
Agriculture plays a cardinal role in
Nigeria’s economy contributing the greatest share to the nation’s gross
domestic product (GDP). For instance, 2016 agriculture’s contribution to total
real GDP was 42.07 percent with crop, livestock, forestry and fishery
accounting for 37.52, 2.65, 5 1.37 and 0.53 percent respectively (National
Bureau of Statistics, 2016). This implies that the crop sub-sector contributed
83.67 percent of agriculture GDP. Further, agriculture generates employment for
over 70 percent of the total labour force, accounts for about 60 percent of the
non-oil exports and, perhaps most important, provides over 80 percent of the
food needs of the country (Adegboye, 2004; Onwuemenyi, 2008; CBN, 2015).
Despite these indicators, rice production in recent times remains inadequate
and indeed far less than its demand. Rice demand exceeds the supply thus
leading to large importation of rice, which further erodes the economies
foreign exchange. According to Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Rural
Development, Nigeria spends 365 billion naira on rice importation annually
(FMARD 2014). Emefiele in Adekunle (2015) reiterated that Nigeria spent 2.4
billion dollars on rice importation in 3 years from 2012 to 2015 Nigeria is
importing what it can produce in abundance and import dependency is
impoverishing Nigerian rice farmers, displacing local production and creating
rising unemployment (Emefiele in Adekunle, 2015).
Import dependency is neither acceptable,
nor sustainable fiscally, economically or politically. It is however worrisome
that with large arable land and determined small holder rice farmers Nigeria
small holder farmers are still performing poorly at subsistence level. The
limited capacity of the Nigerian small holder rice farmers to match the
domestic demand raises a number of pertinent questions both in the policy
circle and amongst researchers. For instance, what factors explain why domestic
rice production lags behind the demand for the commodity in Nigeria? To bridge
the demand-supply gap, effort has to be channeled towards increasing farmer‟s
performance. Theoretically, increasing farmer‟s performance requires either
increased input use especially land expansion, improvement in resource use
efficiency and or 6 technological change derived from use of new technologies
(Andrew & Aye 2014). Given the constant population pressure and other social
and economic constraints in Nigeria, farm land expansion as a source of
increased performance has little application (Onoja, Ibrahim, and Achike 2009).
Hence, the country is left with the option of improving performance of farmers
by improving on their condition through financial services. Microfinance
services aim to help the poor generate income and are very popular which has
become the favorite intervention for development in rural areas. In line with
this development, Federal Government of Nigeria in 2005 gave licenses for the
establishment of several micro finance institutions that offer micro-credit,
micro saving and other financial and non financial services to the rural
farmers, entrepreneurs, artisans (CBN 2005).
However, Ibrahim and Bauer (2013), argued
that despite agricultural credit schemes and licensing micro finance
institutions by the government in the country in a bid to boost agricultural
performance in rural areas, this dream has remained elusive. Studies such as
Myer, (2007); Adams (2010) identified lack of microfinance services as a cause
of low performance by rural farmers. While rice production has being an area of
policy and research debate, studies on performance of farmers have focused more
on larger farmers leaving small holder farmers (Ihegboro 2014; Ayola &
Oboh, 2014). Attention has been on how larger farmers can increase production
output. However, studies and reports like fair-trade, 2013; IFAD and UNEP 2013;
Akinsuyi 2011 have shown that small holder farmers hold the largest production
propensity than the large scale farmers. Although microfinance services were
generally assumed to have positive relationship with farmer‟s performance, some
evidence showed that this is not true. Studies aimed at establishing 7 the
direction of relationship between microfinance and performance of farmers
reported conflicting results. While Nosiru (2010); Tanko, Ajani and Adeniji
(2012); Girabi and Mwakaje (2013); Nzomo and Muturi (2014) reported positive
relationship, in contrast, Hulme and Mosley (1996); Diagne & Zeller (2001);
Karnani (2007) showed that microfinance services have negative impact on
farmers performance.
Format: MS Word
Chapters: 1 - 5, Preliminary Pages, Abstract, References
Delivery: Email
Delivery: Email
No. of Pages: 115
NB: The Complete Thesis is well written and ready to use.
NB: The Complete Thesis is well written and ready to use.
Price: 10,000 NGN
In Stock
Masters Project Topics in Accounting and Finance
Our Customers are Happy!!!
No comments:
Post a Comment
Add Comment