Background to the Problem
A global trend has emerged aimed at reducing
government‘s involvement in the economy. This global trend came about through
the process of privatisation or both privatisation and commercialisation of
government owned enterprises. In Nigeria, as part of its programmes of National
Economic Reforms, the Federal Government introduced privatisation along with
commercialisation. Thus, commercialisation was conceived as an alternative to
privatisation in some cases.1 That is to say, commercialization was introduced
as an alternative to privatisation which was deemed inappropriate.
The reasons offered for this economic policy
vary from country to country. For example, in Britain it was resorted to as ―an
ideologically based program, devised and driven by a powerful leader, motivated
by a combination of intellectual conviction of the benefits of free markets and
hatred of the power of organised labour‖.2 In some jurisdictions,
commercialisation is not used in the same context as it is being used in
Nigeria. Thus in Jurisdiction like South Africa, it is believed that
commercialisation is one of the phases of privatisation. Hence, it was
submitted that ―the entity should first be corporatized, then commercialized,
but in South Africa, Privatisation3 was perceived, and thus, embraced as a
veritable instrument in the restructuring of its troubled economy.4 This is in
tandem with reasons given by the International Monetary Fund (IMF), which
universalized the programme as a key element in economic restructuring of
distressed economies especially in Africa.5 Hence, Privatisation and
Commercialisation became components of structural adjustment program of the
IMF.
In Nigeria, and in most countries of Africa,
interest in the program is motivated by the desire to correct past failures of
development policies and reduce money losing trends of government owned
enterprises.6 The programme of privatisation and commercialisation became
imperative with the national aspiration to strike a balance between political
independence and economic independence. This reason is apt since a country with
political independence devoid of economic independence will not thrive. For any
country in the world to survive and develop, the duo of political and economic
independence must co-exist side by side. The political stability of every
country depends largely on its sound economic policies, growth and development.
The foregoing economic background, paved way
leading to privatisation and commercialisation law and policy in Nigeria in
1988,7 as part of the Structural Adjustment Programme (SAP) of General Ibrahim
Babangida‘s Administration. This law established the Technical Committee on
Privatisation and Commercialisation (TCPC) to implement and oversee the
privatisation programme. SAP is a neo-liberal development strategy by
international financial institution to incorporate national economy into global
market.
TOPIC: APPRAISAL OF THE PRIVATISATION AND COMMERCIALISATION LAW AND POLICY IN NIGERIA
Chapters: 1 - 5
Delivery: Email
Delivery: Email
Number of Pages: 70
Price: 3000 NGN
In Stock

No comments:
Post a Comment
Add Comment