Background to the Study
Since the aftermath of the 9/11
attacks in New York and Washington in 2001, there has been an increase in both
the frequency of terrorist attacks around the world and the counter measures
employed by states to combat terrorism. But some of these counter measures
employed have violated certain norms of international law especially those
norms of International Human Rights Law relating to non derogable rights.
International Human Rights Law
provides adequate safeguards and protection against Human Rights violations
even in times of public emergency that threatens the life of a nation such as
when a state faces the threat of continuous terrorist attacks.
Despite the flexibility built into the
International Human Rights Law and the permissible measures which allow states
to limit and derogate from certain rights in times of public emergency, some
states, notably the united states, have continued to operate outside the
framework of the International Human Rights Law with impunity and at times with
allusion to different moral and legal arguments to justify their position.
These include the legal arguments for
justifying the current practice of targeted killings and drone Strike resorted
to by some states to fight terrorism, and the doctrine of the use of force in
international law as it relates to cross border attacks directed toward
terrorist elements operating within the territories of another state and their
implication on Right to Life, the ticking bomb theory and the justification
canvassed by its proponents and whether such reasons qualifies as exceptions to
the absolute prohibition of the use of torture under International Law and
lastly the policy of transferring terror suspects to countries where they face
the risk of torture and abuse.2
In the light of its findings; this
research thus, recommends inter alia for the provision of a more effective and
better monitoring structure and also a better regulatory safe guards and
protection to ensure proper oversight and control of military operations of
state parties and their Secret Service Agencies. It also recommends the
promotion of transparency in implementing counter terrorism measures and the
empowerment of international courts and quasi-judicial committees like the
Human Rights Committee to ensure the proper enforcement of the accountability
of states parties with respect to cases of Human Rights abuses. Lastly, it
recommends an absolute ban on the use and practice of torture in line with the
current standard of international law and the subsisting international human
right mechanism
TOPIC: AN ASSESSMENT OF THE IMPACT OF COUNTER TERRORISM ON NON DEROGABLE RIGHTS UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW
Chapters: 1 - 5
Delivery: Email
Delivery: Email
Number of Pages: 78
Price: 3000 NGN
In Stock

No comments:
Post a Comment
Add Comment