CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1
BACKGROUND TO THE STUDY
One of the fundamental
responsibilities of the state is to ensure the security of the life and
property of its citizens. Others include the protection of its territoriality
and sovereignty and the guarantee of its socio-economic and political
stability. Security as an essential concept is commonly associated with the
alleviation of threats to cherished values, especially the survival of
individuals, groups or objects in the near future. Thus, security as the name
implies, involves the ability to pursue cherished political and social
ambitions (Williams, 2008:6). According to Palme (1992:9), ―there is a
correlation between security and survival‖. Whereas survival is an essential
condition, security is viewed as safety, confidence, free from danger, fear,
doubt, among others. Therefore, security is ‗survival-plus‘ and the word 'plus'
could be understood from the standpoint of being able to enjoy some freedom
from life-determining threats and some life choices (Booth, 2007: 15). However,
the concept - security, is meaningless without a critical discourse of
something pertinent to secure. Indeed, security could best be understood when
situated within the context, of a referent object. In the long sweep of human
history, the central focus of security has been people (Rothschild, 1995:68).
Contrarily, some scholars especially those in international politics have
argued that when thinking about security, states should be the most important
referents. On the other hand, some analysts have challenged this position by
arguing that any intellectual discourse on security should accord priority to
human beings since without reference to individual humans, security makes no
sense (McSweeney, 1999:127). Notwithstanding these controversial dabates, the
focus of this investigation is on micro security. However, micro security deals
with the internal security of which Nigeria is currently mired in a state of
obfuscation.
Similarly, the security situation in
Nigeria obviously took different dimensions. This period, however, witnessed a
consistent pressure on the government by Movement for the Emancipation of the
Niger Delta (MEND), Movement for the Sovereign State of Biafra (MOSSOB),
increasing spate of kidnapping in the South - East geo – political zone,
incessant bombings in the northern parts of Nigeria by Boko Haran group, Mehem
by the Islamic assailants in Jos crisis, politically motivated killings by
unscrupulous groups, among others (Ameh, 2008:9).
Before the advent of commercial oil
production in the Niger Delta about fifty years ago (in1958), the region was
essentially a pristine environment which supported substantial subsistence
resources for the mostly sedentary populations. These included among other
things, medicinal herbs and barks, fish and shrimp, crabs and clams, wood for
energy and shelter, as well as a stable soil for farming and habitat for exotic
wildlife. There was the Delta elephant, the white crested monkey, the river
hippopotamus, as well as a colorful array of exotic birds, crocodiles, turtles
and alligators. The region also accounted for a large percentage of Nigeria‘s
commercial fisheries industry. Oil prospecting activities however are
associated with the destruction of vegetation, farmlands and human settlements
to allow for seismic cutting lines. Severe environmental hazards associated
with this activity include destruction of fish and some other forms of aquatic
life, both marine and freshwater around the prospecting sites. Noise pollution
and vibration from seismographic blasting also affects buildings, fence walls,
wooden bridges and access roads. When the impact occurs, as has become routine
in the Niger Delta, there is usually no attempt to rectify the damages done to
the environment, health and social well-being of the people and ecosystem. No
compensation whatsoever is considered (Eyinla and Ukpo, 2006). Oil drilling
operations further pollute the underground water. Through a variety of
unethical practices in drilling, more fish and fauna are destroyed, farming and
fishing grounds polluted by toxic waste materials. Also in the production
process, waste water is discharged from major production terminals together
with other contaminants like sludge from storage tanks, oil debris, gaseous pollutants
and sanitary wastes. More of these toxic wastes are released into the already
heavily polluted environment during the process of oil refining, during which
process several chemicals and pollutants such as hydrogen sulphide, oil and
grease, ammonia and toxic heavy metals are discharged into the environment. The
process involved in petroleum resources distribution also include disruption of
the sea bed by dredging activities for pipeline installation beside
malfunctioning flow stations and other oil installations. Sedimentation also
occurs along pipeline channels, besides pollution from tank washing, deck
drainage and loading operations. The routine destruction of environmentally
sensitive regions like the lowlands, wetlands, fish ponds and farmlands are the
regular features. Also involved in this is general land degradation and loss of
soil fertility. In addition to these are the problems associated with the oil
spillage caused by blow-outs, corrosion, equipment failure, operational error
and pipeline vandalisation. Other causes of oil spillage include weakness of
legislative control and enforcement of regulations, the callous nature of the
operations of oil companies which are often shrouded in secrecy. According to
Eyinla and Ukpo (2006), it will be correct to indicate that the greatest single
environmental problem associated with the petroleum industry in contemporary
Nigeria, result from off-shore and on-shore oil spillage. It is estimated that
in over 40 years of oil exploration and production in Nigeria, over 60,000
spills have been recorded, and over 2,000,000 barrels were discharged into the
regions eco-system from oil spillages alone between 1976 and 1996. In 1997 and
1998, Shell Petroleum Development Company (SPDC) spilled 106,000 from its installations
at Jones creek alone. In January 1998, Mobil recorded its worst spillage at the
Idoho offshore site which spread within 30 days from Akwa-Ibom to Lagos. Within
the first months of 2008 alone, Nigeria recorded 418 cases of oil spills.
According to the Minister of Environment, Mrs. Halima Alao: This portends a
great danger to us as a nation, and particularly to the environment and the
social and economic well being of our people (Vanguard, 2008).
This is however a gross understatement
of the severe implications of oil spillage to the region. According to Eyinla
and Ukpo (2006), there are several specific impacts of oil spills relating to
the destruction of the wetlands. These include loss of fish, crustaceans and
other aquatic resources, loss of livelihood through loss of fishing grounds and
gears, wildlife migration, destruction of farmlands, reduced agricultural
productivity and yield, displacement of inhabitants, spread of water borne
epidemics, to mention a few. All of these translate to hunger, grinding poverty
and disease where there are neither hospitals nor herbal remedies which have in
the mean time been rendered impotent by oil production. In addition, the
innumerable gas flares which dot the Niger Delta landscape waters produce heat
and light on a continuous basis, day and night. Not only can fish and fauna not
breed under such conditions, they are also forced to migrate to more suitable
waters elsewhere in the West African coast. Gas flaring is also associated with
atmospheric and thermal pollution and the depletion of vegetation and wild
life. According to Eyinla and Ukpo (2006), damages to buildings, acid rain
formation, depletion of floral periodicity, discomfort to humans and danger of pulmonary
disease epidemic are other environmental problems arising from gas flaring. The
soil, rivers and creeks of Niger Delta, which used to be alkaline in nature
17-40 years ago, have now, become dangerously acidic.
In line with socio-economic practices
in oil bearing communities worldwide, but especially in more advanced
civilizations, discovery and exploitations of oil was always a welcome
development for the inhabitants of such communities. The hope and initial
excitement in the Niger Delta that they would automatically be entitled to
benefits that come with being oil producing communities, was therefore
legitimate. Oil discovery has brought hope that civilized and modern
infrastructure such as electricity, pipe borne water, primary and 5
secondary schools, well equipped
hospitals, better and more modern equipments for exploitation of the region‘s
fish and fauna will become available. There would at last be roads leading
through and linking the communities with the rest of the country. There was also
the expectation that as oil companies begin to carry out their operations and
implement the ideas embodied in their corporate social responsibility, more
people would have the opportunity of gainful employment. But in the context of
prolonged denials and frustrations, neither the oil companies nor government
seem to have come to terms with these pervasive social expectations. One of the
most debilitating disappointments was with human capital development. In order
to get basic education, the youths have to leave their homes in the creeks to
live with relatives and friends in upland communities, most of who often treat
them as servants or even beggars. When they eventually get education to
tertiary levels, most of them are unable to return to their homeland except as
aggrieved and embittered citizens. They had in the process witnessed how the
resources of their ancestral lands are exploited and carted away to develop
other communities in the country, while their people bear the brunt of this
official theft in the form of environmental degradation, political
disenfranchisement, social dislocation and economic despoliation They are
forced to witness how oil companies provide state-of-the art facilities for the
comfort of their employees, most of whom are foreigners to their land, without
adequate consideration for the needs of their hosts, even when doing so is
relatively cheap and feasible. They are for instance, only willing to build
roads, if such would open-up new and lucrative oil fields. They are able to generate
electricity to power their numerous sites within the communities, without
bothering to link their immediate hosts to the same grid, even when it is
cost-effective to do so. Confronted by the stark realities of unemployment in
their homelands, even after getting education abroad, there seems to be only
one choice open to them – take and sell the resources available, directly from
the pipelines if necessary. Hence the incidence of pipeline vandalisation,
illegal bunkering, and their local imperatives of gun running, cult-gang
building and militancy as defence mechanisms (Eyinla and Ukpo (2006) put this
succinctly: A popular stand-up comedian once placed the entire scenario….in
satirical perspective when he insisted that youths are up in arms against government
and multi-national oil companies…because they are tired of being told that
―something good is in the pipeline‖ for them. Rather than wait any further for
those promises to materialize, the youths are taking it upon themselves to
break open oil pipelines in order to redeem the benefits promised! (emphasis
mine).
1.2 STATEMENT OF PROBLEM
The Niger Delta region harbours one of
the world‘s biggest oil reserves of some 34 billion barrels of crude oil
(Robinson, 2006:18-24). At some point, the resources of the Niger Delta region
made Nigeria the largest oil producer in Africa and the sixth largest in the
world (Ajanaku, 2008). With all these attributes, it was expected that oil
exploration would bring economic prosperity to the region but has turned out
instead to be a curse to the people of the region (Ajanaku, 2008; Davis, 2009;
Roberts, 2005) who, until recently, have been neglected by successive
governments (Roberts, 2005; Osuntokun, 1999; Oviasuyi & Uwadiae, 2010:110).
Rather than transform the area into one of the most developed spaces in the
world, oil presence, exploration and exploitation deepened poverty and
undermined development in the region. Activities around exploitation of crude
oil and natural gas in the Niger Delta region have caused irredeemable
ecological devastation to the Niger Delta land over the years (Inokoba &
Imbua, 2010). Some of these problems include water and land pollution as a
result of oil exploration activities, destruction of natural vegetation,
deforestation, destruction of arable farm lands and human settlements, loss of
bio-diversity such as flora and fauna habitats, air pollution, acid rain, gas
flaring, and so on while economic activities such as fishing, farming and
hunting which has been the mainstay of the people and local economy can no
longer be practiced profitably. In addition, a range of harsh socio-economic
conditions such as poverty and underdevelopment, unemployment, high cost of
living, diseases and strange health conditions, unemployment, social disintegration
and restiveness, infrastructural decay, intra and inter-communal clashes, and
general insecurity has gripped the region intermittently. Though the government
offered amnesty to the militants for a very short period that, but a few
militants responded. Oil production continues to be seriously reduced by the
militants‘ attacks and by the stealing of oil (termed bunkering) by militants
and others which have continued to threaten national security and peace.
1.3 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
1. Assess the security situation in
the Niger Delta region.
2. Examine the actions taken towards
abating the Niger Delta Crisis.
3. Examine the impact of the Niger
Delta crisis on Nigeria‘s National Security.
4. Suggest ways to proffer solutions
to the Niger Delta Crisis.
TOPIC: THE NIGER DELTA CRISIS IT’S IMPACT ON NIGERIAN’S NATIONAL SECURITY
Format: MS Word
Chapters: 1 - 5
Delivery: Email
Delivery: Email
Number of Pages: 56
Price: 3000 NGN
In Stock

No comments:
Post a Comment
Add Comment