CHAPTER ONE
1.1
BACKGROUND
Foreign
Policy is a set of carefully articulated goals and objectives which
nation-states seek to realize and actualize in the conduct of their
relationships with other states. It is also a series of responses which a
nation-state offers to the demands which other states put before it. Foreign
policy could also be defined as a set of continuously redefined attitudes and
dispositions which a state brings to the external environment in which it has
to operate in the conduct of foreign policy. For the purpose of clarity, it
must be stated that anything „foreign‟ is something that is external or coming
in from a country that is not one‟s own, while a „policy on the other hand, is
a plan or a course of action agreed or chosen by an organization or government
to pursue with the hope of attaining certain expected results/gains.
Right from
independence, Nigeria‟s foreign policy has been determined by several factors.
One of the most significant factors is that it is the most populous black
nation on earth and this has compelled her to shoulder the leadership of the
black world assuming responsibilities far beyond her borders. Some might say
beyond her means. Even though Nigeria moved in a measured pace, there was no
doubt that the political leadership of the first republic realized that the
country had a legitimate claim to leadership and also that black people in
Africa and the diasporas looked up to Nigeria. Although, in practice, the
Republic of Ghana under Dr. Kwame Nkrumah (1909-1972) painted Nigeria as an
inactive giant with feet of clay, yet Nigeria was not found wanting when it
came to defending the interests of Africans still under colonial domination or
in confronting France when they were determined to continue with the deadly
injurious policy of testing nuclear bombs in the Sah2ara against the wishes of
the African people.
The foreign
policy of any country at any given time is intricately related to its domestic
politics. It, therefore, follows that a country‟s national power has direct
relevance to its foreign policy. The country is big and relatively populous
having about a quarter of Africa‟s population. This population although
backward because of the level of illiteracy, constitutes a big market for
foreign investment. The size of the country and its population has given it a
strategic advantage that cannot be easily overrun.
Its location
in the middle Atlantic astride major trade routes means that friendship with
Nigeria was desirable. Nigeria‟s agricultural and mineral potential was great,
possessing minerals such as oil, iron, columbite, petroleum, Uranium and gas.
The educated middle class on whom a democratic regime could be built was
considerably sizeable. The only draw backs were lack of political direction and
cohesion. The country also had a fundamental flaw since it suffered from
fissiparous ethnic pulls in different directions. This inherent weakness was
later to manifest to manifest in the fratricidal civil war between 1967 and
1970. There have been various attempts made through constitutional device to
tackle the ethnic fission apparent in the country but, there has been more of
acting than action with the result that the situation has continued to
deteriorate, thus, casting a shadow on the future of the country itself.
The Murtala
Mohammed/Olusegun Obasanjo regime carried forward the policy of decolonization
by its support for the MPLA regime in Angola and the provision of arms and
materials for the intensification of the war of liberation in Southern Africa.
The use of Nigeria‟s economic power as leverage against British interests in
the case of nationalization by Obasanjo of British Petroleum over the
disagreement on Rhodesia showed that Nigeria had come of age. There was no
doubt that the threat of further action in the economic area was no longer to
be taken for granted. This facilitated the coming to power of blacks in
Zimbabwe. Since that time Nigeria‟s voice has been listened to carefully in the
process of decolonization and removal of apartheid in South Africa.
The
continuum of events occurring in succession leading from the past to the
present and even into the future of Nigerian foreign policy since 1960 has
constantly been changing, though the principles guiding her foreign relations
remain the same. Nigerian leaders are largely responsible for these unstable
external relations.
Since
Nigeria‟s foreign policy is deeply rooted in Africa with strategic emphasis on
political and economic operation, peaceful dispute resolution, and global
non-alignment, Nigerian leaders also have their attention focused on successful
implementation of these principles. However, the influence of personality on
Nigeria‟s relations with other countries cannot be ignored as different leaders
adopt different styles in conducting external relations.
Examining
the complexity of all the attributes, behavioral, temperamental, emotional and
mental that characterizes the leader both at the theoretical and practical
levels is therefore important in understanding Nigeria‟s foreign policy. In
this research however, the foreign policy and international diplomacy of
Nigeria under President Olusegun Obasanjo‟s administration(1999-2007) shall be
analyzed. Analysis of Nigeria‟s foreign policy shows that most if not all
leaders operate within four concentric levels of national interest. The
innermost circle represents Nigeria‟s own security, independence and prosperity
and is centered on its immediate neighbors- Benin, Cameroon, Chad and Niger,
the second circle revolves around Nigeria‟s relations with its west African neighbors,
the third circle focuses on continental African issues of peace, development
and democratization; and the fourth circle involves Nigeria‟s relations with
organizations, institutions and states outside Africa. With this in mind, each
Nigerian Head of State or President works to ensure that no single part is
affected in pursuing the country‟s foreign policy.
The
assumption of power by Chief Olusegun Obasanjo served as a catalyst in the
history of international relations as far as Nigeria was concerned. His
government injected new innovations and dynamism into the Nations foreign
policy affairs. Nigeria became a regional power and center of influence,
particularly in Africa. As at inauguration in May, 1999, Obasanjo inherited a
nation with a battered image and without credibility externally. This study
examines Nigeria‟s foreign policy under President Olusegun Obasanjo‟s
administration and his determination to regain Nigeria‟s lost glory and
re-integration into the international arena. It provides a detailed background
on the impact of Obasanjo‟s international diplomacy in rebuilding Nigeria‟s
image as well as imparting vigour into Nigeria‟s international politics. Study
shows that President Olusegun Obasanjo engaged in a shuttle diplomacy across the
major capitals of the globe.
The nation
has achieved significant gains through the regime‟s shuttle diplomacy. Apart
from the psychological relief following its re-integration and accommodation
into world affairs, Nigeria assumed the leadership of several international
organizations notably the ECOWAS, AU, and G-77. It also hosted very important
international summits including those of the Commonwealth Heads of State and
government and the AU in 2004, the New Partnership for African Development
(NEPAD) in 2005, and severally the ECOWAS since 1999. The study analyses the
domestic policies of the Obasanjo‟s administration and how it shaped the
country‟s policy of partnership. It can be said therefore that the period
between 1999 and 2007 Nigeria‟s foreign policy took a new turn in restoring the
image of the country through a global shuttle diplomacy of President Olusegun
Obasanjo. Therefore, the focus of this study is to examine the role played by
President Olusegun Obasanjo in restoring the image of the country, analyze his foreign
policy posture and give an appraisal of the successes and failures in terms of
domestic and international repositioning.
Essentially,
diplomacy is an established method of discourse or the art of managing
international relations chiefly by negotiation or conduct of official relations
among states. The fact that the Nigerian foreign policy and International
Diplomacy in the Obasanjo years were re-invigorated cannot be over-emphasized.
Obasanjo‟s administration created a sort of spark when it came to relations
with other states. And due to the fact that he was highly respected when
dealing with other heads of state, Nigeria was highly respected as well in the
international system and that enhanced the pursuit of our foreign policy. The
Nigerian foreign policy has the general purpose to ensure security, Autonomy,
Welfare, and Status.
1.2 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM
The
blossoming Nigerian foreign policy of today is as result of Former President
Olusegun Obasanjo‟s administration. Relations between Nigerian and other state
and non-state actors in international politics from 1999 onward were based on
democratic principles. The tit-for-tat diplomacy of late Gen. Sani
Abacha, de facto President of Nigeria from 1993 to 1998 had greatly
damaged the image of Nigeria. The government was accused of human rights abuses
and was repeatedly condemned by the U.S State Department. There were breaks in
relationships with many countries with threats of economic sanctions from
others. Apart from this and most importantly, the government was characterized
by an inconsistent foreign policy which was definitely not good for Nigeria and
therefore made Nigeria a scorn in the comity of nations. The coming of
President Olusegun Obasanjo and the various reforms which he embarked upon
actually brought Nigeria out of her messy and shameful situation that late Gen
Sani Abacha put the country into.
The main thrust
of this research is to take an objective view regarding the foreign policy of
Nigeria during the Obasanjo years and how these policies were executed, and
also to compare it to the previous ways that Nigerian foreign policies were
made and executed. It has been eluded by voices in the Nigerian system that
Obasanjo‟s administration sort of “brought back to live” the Nigerian foreign
policy and international diplomacy.
1.3 OBJECTIVES OF THE RESEARCH
The research
work focuses on the following objectives:
i. To
examine Nigeria‟s foreign policy initiatives under Obasanjo;
ii. To
identify factors that aided the re-invigoration of Nigeria‟s foreign policy and
international diplomacy during the Obasanjo years; and
iii. To
evaluate the impact of Obasanjo‟s administration on the execution of Nigerian
foreign policy and international diplomacy.
TOPIC: NIGERIA AND THE RE-INVIGORATION OF FOREIGN POLICY AND INTERNATIONAL DIPLOMACY IN THE OBASANJO YEARS
Format: MS Word
Chapters: 1 - 5
Delivery: Email
Delivery: Email
Number of Pages: 60
Price: 3000 NGN
In Stock
No comments:
Post a Comment
Add Comment