ABSTRACT
This paper examines the impact and
nexus between Foreign Policy and Nigeria‟s Economic Development, using President
Goodluck Jonathan administration as a case study. As such, it focus on
Transformation Agenda (2011-2015) as the Foreign Policy thrust of the
administration, in relation to job creation, infrastructure, real sector and
governance; income (GDP growth rate), stability of price (inflation and
exchange rate), employment rate (job creation), poverty rate and so on as the
key sectors for measuring the level of economic development in Nigeria. It
postulates bad/weak leadership, corruption, inadequate funding, and insecurity
and so on as the main deficit for the weak outcome of Transformation Agenda.
This research work adopts the descriptive and analytical approach to examine to
examine the economic development of Nigeria under the focused dispensation. The
research work is based on System Theory, Soft Power Theory and Sustainable
Development Theory, to analyze the methodology employed in achieving
Transformation Agenda which was a comprehensive framework for transforming
Nigeria to one of the world twenty leading economies by the year 2020.
CHAPTER ONE
1.1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION
States all over the world design and
implement foreign policies in order to guide their foreign relations as well as
protect, promote and defend their vital national interests which could be in areas
of trade, strategic and diplomatic interest and whatever a country might
consider as its vital national interests so therefore, foreign policy is a
reflection of domestic policy, it is the promotion of national interest at
international level. To this end, the history of Nigeria foreign policy since
1960 has constantly been changing, though the principles guiding her foreign
relations remain the same either under military or civilian regimes in the
recent past, because various regimes have tried to pursue the country's foreign
policy under almost the same objectives, the style and vigor of their
leadership, agenda setting, mobilization of critical material and immaterial
resources have differed with consequent difference in concrete national goal
attainments (Nwankwo,2013:213). The principles of Nigeria‟s foreign policy have
since independence in 1960 been broadly spelt out in the constitution and has
tenaciously guided the conduct of its foreign relations over the years from the
first Prime Minister Tafawa Balewa, to the Former Head of State, President
Goodluck Jonathan. The principles of Nigeria foreign policy deals with what
guides the formulation and actualization of its foreign policy, in other to
ensure the survival of the state and its values in the course of its relations
with other actors especially states in the international system. In the
speeches of Nigeria‟s first Prime Minister Sir Tafawa Balewa, to the Federal
House of Representatives and the United Nations General Assembly on 20th August
and 7th October 1960 respectively, he enunciated the general principles which
would guide the country‟s foreign policy (Review of Nigeria‟s Foreign Policy;
2012, P289).
The principles which have imbued
Nigerians foreign policy since independence include the following; protection
of the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Nigerian state, promotion 11
of the socio-economic well-being of
Nigeria, enhancing Nigeria‟s image and status in the world at large, respect
for the sovereignty and territorial integrity of other states, non-interference
in the internal affairs of other states, promotion of unity and solidarity of
African states; total political, economic, social and cultural emancipation and
rejuvenation of Africa, an unflinching commitment to the liberation of
countries still under colonial rule, as well as the removal of remaining
vestiges of colonialism in Africa (Nigeria at the United Nations; Partnership for
a Better World 1991: P29). However, foreign policy in the contemporary world
has taken a completely new shape, the foreign policy of a state in today‟s
world must consider issues such as; production, exchange, technology, markets,
economic development, political stability and predictability, prevailing
leadership and its qualities which are prerequisites for effective foreign
policy-making process, this implies the need for a shift in paradigm of
Nigeria‟s foreign policy principles in respect to the dynamics that will shape
the formulation and actualization of the foreign policy objectives of Nigeria
and prior to this, the advent of democratic government in 1999 in which section
19 of the 1999 constitution states that, foreign policy principles shall be; promotion
of a just world economic order among others (Review of Nigeria‟s Foreign
Policy; 2012, P289). Also, with the advent of democratization, as well as the
eradication of apartheid and racism in the continent of Africa in early 20th century
as well as the declining economic setbacks brought about the change in
Nigeria‟s foreign policy focus which led to the emergence of economic diplomacy
aimed at strengthening Nigeria‟s economic interest, promoting and protecting
the country‟s national interest, has become a significant priority of the
Nigeria foreign policy.
They have been a number of visions,
programs and policies pursued by various heads of government of Nigeria, either
under the military or civilian regimes which is directed towards 12
socio-economic reforms since
independence in 1960, this is consequent upon the fact that Nigeria‟s foreign
policy has always been a product of the Head of State, thus the President must
accept responsibility for policy concept and design. Different heads of state as
well as president of Nigeria has adopted foreign policy as an instrument of
economic development, economic development is a policy intervention aimed at
the economic and social well-being of the citizens, economic growth, increasing
the literacy ratio, improve infrastructure and health care services. Alhaji
Shehu Shagari, who was elected in 1979 and ruled up to January 1984, tagged his
policy as the Green Revolution, aimed at transforming the agricultural sector
and use the gains to thereafter to revolutionize other key sectors of the
nation‟s economy. Shortly after these General Ibrahim Badamosi Babangida took
over the mantle of leadership in 1984 and hinged his administration policy
package on the Structural Adjustment Program (SAP) aimed at addressing fundamental
and structural imbalance in the economy, diversify the economy, and strengthen
the currency, this he did by opening up the domestic economy to international
market forces and institutions such as World Bank (IBRD) and International
Monetary Fund (IMF) to play key roles with the hope of using the benefits to
transform the whole economy. Thereafter, General Sani Abacha came into power in
1993 after the controversial annulment of the 1993 presidential elections with
a different focus on the foreign policy objective of Nigeria and tagged his
policy thrust vision 2010 which was aimed at reducing the influence of
international financial institutions and centered mainly on the exploitation of
domestic efforts towards transforming the economy. In 1999 to 2007, Chief
Olusegun Obasanjo became the president; his first four years in office were
focused mainly on consolidating democracy. Thereafter, he concentrated on
reforms in Banking and Telecommunication sectors; he also initiated the
National Economic Empowerment and development Strategies (NEEDS), this reform
program rested on four key strategies which were; reforming government and
institutions, growing the private sector, implementing a social charter and
value re-orientation. These policies, combined together have been widely
acclaimed as successful as they have had some appreciable impact on other
sectors of the economy. Another foreign policy reversal introduced by Alhaji
Musa Yar‟adua following his election and inauguration in may 2007, his foreign policy
thrust was tagged the 7-point Agenda; were he identified seven sectors of the
economy as the main source of transforming the entire economy. Due to the
medical conditions of President Umaru Musa Yar‟adua, a Federal High Court on
the 13th of January 2010 conferred on the then Vice President Goodluck Jonathan
the power to carry out state affairs but was formally sworn in on the 6th of
May 2010 following the formal announcement of the death of President Umaru Musa
Yar‟adua the previous day.
President Goodluck Jonathan was sworn
in as the 14th Head of State on the 29th of May 2011, at his inauguration he
directed for a review of Nigeria‟s foreign policy with focus on Nigeria‟s
domestic priorities which has continued to propel Nigeria‟s actions and reactions
on the international arena; these key domestic priorities include good
governance, electoral reforms, transparency and anti-corruption, commerce and
industry, energy (electricity supply) reform and investment, defense and
security as well as agricultural and rural development. And thus tagged his
foreign policy thrust as the Transformation Agenda which covers the period 2011
to 2015, according to President Goodluck Jonathan (2011), Nigeria‟s foreign
policy and diplomacy are now anchored on the realization of the Transformation
Agenda through the attraction of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) and most
particularly the diversification of the entire economy from total dependence on
oil to a significant reliance on non-oil driven economy upon which real economic
growth and development can be founded. The Transformation Agenda of President
Goodluck Ebele Jonathan draws its aspirations from Nigeria‟s vision 20:2020
which was 14
articulated under the administration
of President Olusegun Obasanjo (1999-2007) in the fourth republic. The
Transformation Agenda captures among other things, the road map and blue print
to achieving national economic growth and becoming one of the twenty largest
economies in the world by 2020 ( Gyong; European Scientific Journal, vol8).
President Goodluck Ebele Jonathan at
his inauguration inherited a nation with a battered image because of the ill
health of his predecessor and his inability to attend important international
meetings, Nigeria lost many positions in multilateral associations, forsook
obligations and thus the ship of the Nigerian state was sailing rudderless on
the international waters of foreign policy prompting President Goodluck
Jonathan to center his foreign policy on Citizen Diplomacy which involve
diplomatic shuttles with the aim of returning Nigeria to the international
arena, such as the delisting of Nigeria from the discriminatory rule of the
Department of Homeland Security on special screening of passengers on
international flights to United States of America that specifically targeted
Nigerians due to the Christmas day attempted bombing of United States of
America airline by a Nigerian in 2009 consequently leading to the signing of
the first United States of America-Nigeria Bi-national Commission in April
2010, aimed to establish a mechanism for sustained bilateral high level
dialogue to promote and increase diplomatic, economic and security co-operation
between the two countries, shortly after the visit of President Goodluck
Jonathan to United States of America. Also, in line with the Citizen Diplomacy
Agenda, President Goodluck Jonathan took time to interact with Nigerians abroad
and showed his ready to take up their problems with their host countries by
engineering a purposeful mobilization and instrumentalisation of Nigerians in
the Diaspora for national development through the formation of the Nigerians in
Diaspora Organization (NIDO) in all countries where there are Nigerians.
Remarkably, all these are the component of the foreign policy objectives of the
Transformation Agenda (Nwankwo2013:215).
Furthermore, for the past two years
the Nigerian economy has been growing consistently by nearly 7% per annum, this
is one of the highest growth rates in the world owing to the economy reforms of
the Transformation Agenda which has made Nigeria the biggest economy in Africa
with Gross Domestic Product (GDP) for 2013 totaled 80.3 trillion naira and
according to the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) in
its 2012 investment report; Nigeria has become the number one destination for
foreign investments in Africa. The Transformation Agenda aims to deepen the
effects and provide a sense of priority policies and programs which when
implemented would transform the Nigerian Economy to meet the future needs of
the people. However, we must put at the back of our mind that Transformation
Agenda cannot be realize in a corrupt system; therefore sincerity of purpose
should e the ladder for the attainment of the Transformation Agenda. To this
end, this paper examines the economic direction of Transformation Agenda as
well as its role as the foreign policy thrust of President Goodluck Jonathan,
the paper focuses on the economic growth of Nigeria within the time frame of
2011 to 2015
1.2 STATEMENT OF PROBLEM
Nigeria government is characterized by
an inconsistent foreign policy which has made her a scorn in the committee of
nations; this has led to the question on how to manage the foreign policy of
Nigeria to serve her domestic economic development interest. It is against this
backdrop that Transformation Agenda was formulated as the foreign policy thrust
of the present administration, in which Nigeria‟s economy has grown very fast
in the last few years making her the largest economy in Africa. However, the
challenge before the government is how to move the nation away from an
oil-dominated economy, institute the basics for a private-sector driven
economy, build the local economy on international best practices, and transform
the passive oil industry to a more pro-active one and restructure the country
along the lines of a more decentralized federalism.
The problem being looked into in this
research is the Economic Developmental problem facing Nigeria since
independence. There are various problems related to the development of Nigeria
Economy. This paper identifies the following factors;
Bad Governance; these element pose a serious problem
in Nigeria. These phenomenon are encompassed by the absence of a ruling class
(leadership) dedicated to the pursuit of economic & societal development
which will strengthen state institutions and democratize the society. As argued
by Dr. John Akude;
“The rulers of most African states are
not interested in pursuing economic development. They use power to amass wealth
which makes the personalization and misuse of power inevitable. Personal power
thwarts institutionalization and has weakening effects on the state”(Akude,
2007).
As such, bad leadership has often
proved to be a source of development impediment in Nigeria owing to
embezzlements of public funds which has hindered governments role in
refurbishing basic infrastructures such as transportation which would have
enhanced easy mobility as well as attract foreign investors through improve
power supply. Nigeria leaders are more interested in filling their bank
accounts than ensuring the general welfare of the populace to which they have
been sworn to serve. These leaders indirectly and directly propagate
corruption, conflict, ethnic & religious divide as well as the
Institutional failure of bureaucracies within the various countries.
Corruption: Corruption is the perversion of
integrity or state of affairs through bribery, favor or moral depravity. It
takes place when at least two parties have interacted to change the structure
or process of society or the behavior of functionaries in order to produce
dishonest, unfaithful or defiled situations. Nigeria politicians are regarded
as corrupt, Trillions of Nigeria‟s wealth have been siphoned continuously, and
deposited in European, North American banks. Some of these wealth‟s are in
those continents in form of properties and assets. Examples of such leaders
include; General Sani Abacha. In other words, Nigeria leaders are corrupt, but
their corrupt practices are backed also by the Western financial institutions.
Equally, Nigeria‟s growth is
sectorally concentrated as 90 percent of economic activity and growth come from
three or four sectors (oil, crops, trading, and real estate), as well as
regionally concentrated, the remaining 29 or 30 sectors account for only ten to
20percent of economic growth and activity, including telecoms, manufacturing,
banking, insurance, construction and all the other big name sectors and thus
diversifying the economy becomes a serious problem for the success of the
Transformation Agenda.
1.3 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
Specifically, the study seeks to
achieve the following objectives;
1. To provide a detailed analysis on
the implementation, achievements and limitations of the Transformation Agenda
as a foreign policy thrust of President Goodluck Jonathan.
2. To investigate the nexus between
foreign policy and economic development with emphasize on the foreign policy
objectives of Nigeria under President Goodluck Jonathan.
3. To show the current economy
development of Nigeria using Macroeconomics framework factors in the duration
of the Transformation Agenda as the Foreign Policy Thrust of President Jonathan
Administration.
TOPIC: IMPACT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ON NIGERIA‟S FOREIGN POLICY: UNDER PRESIDENT GOODLUCK JONATHAN ADMINISTRATION (2011-2015)
Chapters: 1 - 5
Delivery: Email
Delivery: Email
Number of Pages: 90
Price: 3000 NGN
In Stock

No comments:
Post a Comment
Add Comment