ABSTRACT
This study
examined the effect of punishment and reward on academic performance of senior
secondary school students in Idemili North local government area of Onitsha
Anambra State. Five research questions were formulated to guide the
study. Through the process of simple random sampling, a total of two hundred
(200) students from five (5) senior secondary schools were selected to
participate in the study. The major instrument used for collecting data was a
questionnaire tagged EPRAP. The data collected were analyzed. Chi square was
used to test the hypotheses. Findings showed that punishment has significant
effect on the academic performance of students. It was also discovered that
intrinsic reward has no effect on the academic performance of students.
Research also showed that extrinsic reward has a significant effect on the
academic performance of students. From results findings, it was recommended
that students should focus more on self motivators rather than on gifts and
awards. Also, teachers, and parents should use all forms of punishment and
reward systems appropriately as over use frequent reliance on any of them may
reduce the effectiveness.
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
PAGES
TITLE
PAGE i
CERTIFICATION ii
DEDICATION iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT iv
ABSTRACT v
TABLE OF
CONTENTS vi
CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY 1
1.2 STATEMENT OF
THE
PROBLEM 4
1.3 PURPOSE OF THE
STUDY 5
1.4 SIGNIFICANCE OF THE
STUDY 5
1.5 REASEARCH
QUESTIONS 6
1.6 RESEARCH
HYPOTHESES 7
1.7 SCOPE OF THE
STUDY 7
1.8 OPERATIONAL DEFINITION OF
TERMS 7
CHAPTER TWO: REVIEW OF RELATED
LITERATURE
2.1 CONCEPT OF PUNISHMENT AND
REWARD 9
2.2 CORPORAL PUNISHMENT AND ACADEMIC
PERFORMANCE 16
2.3 REWARD AND ACADEMIC
PERFORMANCE 19
2.4 SUSPENSION AND ACADEMIC
PERFORMANCE 26
2.5 EXPULSION AND ACADEMIC
PERFORMANCE 30
2.6 SUMMARY OF
REVIEW 39
CHAPTER THREE: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
3.1 RESEARCH
DESIGN 42
3.2 POPULATION
OF THE
STUDY 42
3.3 SAMPLE
AND SAMPLING
TECHNIQUE 42
3.4 RESEARCH
INSTRUMENT 43
3.5 VALIDITY
OF RESEARCH
INSTRUMENT 43
3.6 PROCEDURE
FOR DATA
COLLECTION 44
3.7 METHOD
OF DATA
ANALYSIS 44
CHAPTER FOUR: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
4.1 INTRODUCTION 45
4.3 RESEARCH
QUESTIONS 45
4.4. TEST OF HYPOTHESIS 49
4.5 SUMMARY OF
FINDINGS 52
CHAPTER
FIVE: DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSION, RECOMMENDATIONS AND
SUGGESTION FOR FURTHER STUDIES.
5.1 DISCUSSION OF
FINDINGS 54
5.2
CONCLUSION 57
5.3
RECOMMENDATIONS 57
5.4 SUGGESTIONS FOR FURTHER STUDY 58
REFERENCES
REFERENCES
APPENDIX
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background of the Study
Students are priceless assets and
most essential elements in education. It is absolutely necessary to direct
students to exhibit acceptable attitude and behavior within and outside the
school. In an attempt to achieve an organized and peaceful school environment
and maintain law and order, school management specifies rules and regulations
to guide the activities of members of the educational
organization. Student’s discipline is a prerequisite to almost everything
a school has to offer students (Selfert and Vornberg, 2002). Seifert and
Vornberg further linked discipline with both the culture and climate of the
school thus. In schools where discipline is a serious problem, for example,
where students bully others, parents tend to transfer their children to
‘better’ schools, and because the well behaved usually perform well (Rigby,
2000), their transfer can affect the overall performance of that school.
Troublesome students can sometimes make teachers react emotionally to the
extent of using punishment. But punishment, instead of curbing behavior, can
aggravate it (Dreikurs, Grunwald and Pepper 1998). Currently,
schools have different types of reward and penalty policy in place, but almost
all of them have one common goal which is to motivate students to learn.
Educators nowadays are aware that giving penalties are counterproductive.
Punishment is the use of physical or
psychological force or action that causes pain in an attempt to prevent
undesirable behavior from recurring. Scolding, threats, deprivations, and
spankings are all forms of punishment. Back in the nineteenth century, Froebel
wrote that the use of punishment was a good way for adults to make a child
“bad”. If the goal for child is the development of morality, of making good
choices on his /her own, then punishment should not be involved .conditions
should be created that not only allow but strongly induce children to be or
become moral and disciplined individuals who can make good choices on their
own (Bettelheim,1985;Ramsburg,1997).Punishment tends to generate anger,
defiance, and a desire for revenge. Moreover, it also gives encouragement to
the use of authority rather than reason thus this would tend to break the
relationship between adult and child (Kohn, 1994).Punishment teaches a child
that those who have the power can force others to do what they want them to
do(Bettelheim,1985;Samalin and Whitney,1995)
Children can be categorized as
intrinsically or extrinsically motivated. Every teacher in the classroom uses
strategies to acknowledge and encourage appropriate social and academic
behavior by their students. These strategies take many forms, some overt and
some dramatic (presentation of tokens or recognition at an assembly). Since
Thorndike (1874-1949) described the Law of effect, educators and psychologists
have noted that when a behavior is successful it is more likely to occur again
in similar circumstances. Many teachers believe that motivation can be “jump
started” by providing tangible rewards such as stickers, candy or prizes. They
assert that reinforcing appropriate behaviors can have positive results since
children tend to continue or repeat an action that is rewarded. Others argue
that rewards devalue learning and counteract the development of self
–discipline and intrinsic motivation. These opponents assert that tangible
rewards produce short-term changes and only serve as motivators if students
wants them. They contend the use of rewards fosters competition and the “what’s
in it for me?” attitude; the more they are used, the more
incentives students expect. The simple message is that the consequences of a
behavior affect future performance of that behavior. If, following the
contingent delivery of a consequence, a behavior becomes more likely in the
future, then that consequence was reinforcing or rewarding. An effective
rewards and penalty system promotes positive behavior and regular attendance.
It is the essential foundation for a creative learning and teaching
environment.The ultimate
goal of rewarding children is to help them internalize positive behaviours so
that they will not need a reward. Eventually, self-motivation will be
sufficient to induce them to perform the desired behaviour, and outside
reinforcement will no longer be necessary.
This research therefore, points out
that in order to impart knowledge and facilitate students learning, teachers
make use of different strategies (punishment and reward). The forms of
punishment under study in this research are corporal punishment, suspension,
and expulsion and the types of reward under study in this research are
intrinsic and extrinsic rewards.
1.2 STATEMENT OF
THE PROBLEM
In Nigeria and the world all over,
academic performance remains a vital means through which students learning is
measured and evaluated. The increasing poor performance in public examination
has over the years been a great concern to stakeholders in education.
Government, educational administrators and managers, captain of industries and
professionals from all walks of life have continued to show their concern for
the dwindling academic performance of senior secondary school students in public
examinations such as WAEC (West Africa Examination Council), NECO(National
Examination Council), JAMB (Joint Admissions and Matriculation Board), and
NABTEB (National Business and Technical Examinations Board.
However, the dwindling performance
of students in public examination can be attributed to several factors such as
poor study habits, lack of concentration in class, indiscipline, ineffective
use of punishment and reward, family issue, peer influence, absenteeism,
failure to reward appropriate and punish inappropriate behavior and the likes.
The falling standard of education is
a pressing problem of the society and it has become a cankerworm which must be
tackled. Efforts made to identify the cause of these problems and to suggest
possible solution has led educational researchers and scholars to investigate
some teacher, school environment and students variable as correlates of
students’ academic performance. Although these have led to improvement in
students’ academic performance, it appears that such improvement is adjudged to
be insignificant. This however is an indication that more investigation needs
to be conducted for students’ academic performance to be improved upon
significantly. This study therefore filled this gap by investigating the effect
of punishment and reward on senior secondary school students’ Academic
Performance in Idemili North Local Government Area of Onitsha Anambra State.
1.3 PURPOSE OF THE STUDY
The purposes of this study are to:
1. Determine
the effect of Corporal Punishment on the Academic Performance of Senior
Secondary School students in Idemili North Local government Area of Onitsha
Anambra State.
2. Determine
the effect of Suspension on the Academic Performance of Senior Secondary School
Students in Idemili North Local government Area of Onitsha
Anambra State.
3. Determine
the effect of Expulsion on the Academic Performance of Senior Secondary School
Students in Idemili North Local government Area of Onitsha
Anambra State.
4. Determine
the effect of Intrinsic Reward on the Academic Performance of Senior Secondary
School Students in Idemili North Local government Area of Onitsha
Anambra State.
5. Determine
the effect of Extrinsic Reward on the Academic Performance of Senior Secondary
School Students in Idemili North Local government Area of Onitsha
Anambra State.
1.4
SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY
The study will be of much importance
to teachers in Idemili North Local Government area of Onitsha Anambra State on
how to effectively make use of punishment and rewards in their relationship
with the students.
The study will also help students to
understand the appropriate behaviors to exhibit in and outside the school. For
the parents, the study will help them to know which behavior exhibited by the
child requires reward and which requires punishment.
Through this study, the stakeholders
in education sector may come to appreciate the implications of punishment and
reward in the Senior Secondary Schools. It is hoped that this study will help
the Senior Secondary Schools administrators in Idemili North Local Government
Area of Onitsha Anambra State to b improve on the academic
performance of students in various schools.
This study will also help to
discover the effects of punishment and reward on learning in some selected
Secondary Schools in Idemili North Local Government area of Onitsha
Anambra State.
1.6 REASEARCH
QUESTIONS
1. What
effect does corporal punishment have on the academic performance of Senior
Secondary School students in Idemili North Local government Area of Onitsha
Anambra State?
2. What
is the effect of suspension on the academic performance of Senior Secondary
School Students in Idemili North Local Government Area of Onitsha Anambra State?
3. What
is the effect of expulsion on the academic performance of Senior Secondary
School students?
4. What
is the effect of extrinsic reward on the academic performance of Senior
Secondary School students?
5. What
is the effect of intrinsic Reward on the academic performance of Senior
Secondary School
students?
1.7 RESEARCH
HYPOTHESES
1. There
is no significant effect of corporal punishment on the academic performance of
Senior Secondary School students.
2. There
is no significant effect of suspension on the academic performance of Senior
Secondary School students.
3. There
is no significant effect of expulsion on the academic performance of Senior
Secondary School students.
4. There
is no significant effect of intrinsic reward on the academic performance of
Senior Secondary School students
5. There
is no significant effect of extrinsic reward on the academic performance of
Senior Secondary School students
1.7 SCOPE OF THE STUDY
The research will be carried out in
selected Secondary Schools in Idemili North Local Government Area of Onitsha
Anambra State.
1.8
OPERATIONAL DEFINITION OF TERMS
The following terms were used in the
work,
PUNISHMENT:
An act of correcting a wrong ‘act’ or character exhibited.
REWARD:
An act of appreciating a job well done.
MOTIVATION:
An act of rewarding or providing with an incentive.
REINFORCEMENT:
An act of giving more force or effectiveness to; strengthen.
TOPIC: EFFECT OF PUNISHMENT AND REWARD ON ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF STUDENTS IN SCHOOLS
Format: MS Word
Chapters: 1 - 5
Delivery: Email
Delivery: Email
Number of Pages: 65
Price: 3000 NGN
In Stock
No comments:
Post a Comment
Add Comment