DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF
TEACHER-BASED ASSESSMENT SYSTEM
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY
Introduction For teachers to judge the
attainments of their own students has been widely acknowledged as offering a
potentially more dependable basis for summative assessments of student
performance. Teachers’ ability to draw on evidence from numerous events within
a student’s learning programme should, at least in principle, ensure that
teacher judgments of such evidence will more accurately reflect student
performance than would evidence from external tests and examinations. The case
for teacher judgment to contribute to summative assessments has been succinctly
made as: …teachers can sample the range of a pupil’s work more fully than can
any assessment instruments by an agency external to the school. This enhances
both reliability (because it provides more evidence than is available through
externally devised assessment instruments) and validity (it provides a wider
range of evidence). (Mansell, James, et.al., 2009) This argument has fuelled
the case for performance assessments in the USA (Resnick & Resnick, 1992),
for assessment by teachers in high school qualifications in the UK (Wilmut,
2004), and for reliance on teacher judgment in school-based assessment at the
end of secondary school in Queensland, Australia (Maxwell, 2010). Harlen (2005)
has reviewed the research evidence on the reliability of teachers’ assessments
for summative purposes, leading her to conclude that:
When steps are taken to moderate the
results, the reliability of teachers’ judgments is comparable to that of tests.
(Harlen, 2011)
What form should a system in which
teacher judgment has a role take? In summative assessment systems that rely on
evidence from tests and examinations much attention is focussed on test items,
the responses to which will be the basis for conclusions about student
performance. In systems where teacher judgment has a role the main focus of
attention has usually been on how such judgments can be consistent when they
are arrived at by a large number of teachers using diverse sources of evidence
obtained in circumstances that are less constrained than test papers taken
under examination conditions. And yet both the student responses to tasks set
during a programme and their responses to items in a time-limited test are in
fact key points within an assessment process that begins with the design of a
course programme and ends, for summative purposes, with the reporting of an
overall measure of performance for each student following the programme. To
focus only on the admittedly key point in the process where evidence is
elicited and initial judgments are made is to overlook the fact such a process,
whether teacher-based or test-based, needs to be structured in such a way as to
maximise validity and reliability. The structure of a test-based process is not
always open to public view but anyone familiar with the work of testing
agencies will be aware that there is a series of critical stages in that
process, first to develop a set of appropriate test items and then to ensure
that student responses are judged in ways that control for variations in
assessor judgment. What appears to be less widely recognised is that if a
system based on teacher judgment is to be credible it will require equivalent
structures. This paper will start by attempting first to identify the stages
that need to be built in to a system of teacher-based summative assessment. It
will then move on to explain and discuss how two such systems are being
developed in Wales to assess students at the ages of 11 and 14. It will
conclude by arguing that unless systems of teacher-based assessment are
designed, implemented and supported by a suitable infrastructure they are
unlikely to command the confidence of students, teachers or the wider public.
DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF TEACHER-BASED ASSESSMENT SYSTEM
Chapters: 1 - 5
Delivery: Email
Delivery: Email
Number of Pages: 75
Price: 3000 NGN
In Stock

No comments:
Post a Comment
Add Comment