ABSTRACT
The conceptual divergence in respect
of the formation of a valid will under both Islamic and common laws will be
examined and discussed. Starting from introduction which will introduce us to
the general message of the work. The chapters therein have been divided into
five.
Chapter one deals with the
introduction as mentioned above, and chapter two will talk on pre and post
Islamic era of Will.
Chapter three deals with Will under
Common Law, its position in the common law as well as under the English
statute. Chapter four on the other hand, deals with the analytical comparison
of what has been discussed in both chapters two and three, while chapter five,
as the last chapter will focus on the general remark, summary and conclusion.
In the Jahiliyah period, before the
advent of Islam, Arabs dispose of their properties as they like, as no law
concerning bequest or inheritance ever existed to guide them. They could make
bequest in favour of any one, depriving their own heirs such as their children,
wives and parents. But by the advent of Islam, the legal Quranic injunctions in
respect of Will were revealed. These are that wasiyyah (Will) can be made only
on 1/3 (one-third) of the entire estate; that no one can make a Will in respect
of any legal Quranic heirs etc.
On the other hand the English concept
of Will under the common law has also made it un-compulsory on a testator to
include any provision for his wife and children, that he could make his will in
favour of any person without limitation what so ever.
Under Islamic law, a testator in not
bound to make a will in writing, neither the witness are bound to attest to it.
A bequest in Islamic law may either be in writing or by words of mouth. In
either case, it should at least be made before two witnesses. While under the
common law, the testator must make the will in writing and signed in the
presence of witnesses, who should also attest to it as prescribed.
Distinguishing feature in the area of
capacity in term of age, in also a remarkable aspect which has been resolved in
this research. Under the Islamic law, physical puberty is attained at the age
of fifteen (15) or above. While under the common law, the Wills Act of 1837
provides that no will made by a person under the age of twenty-one (21) should
be valid, exceptora few exceptions.
Further more, in Sharia, bequeathal
property should not be something declared illegal or prohibited to possess,
such as pigs, intoxicants etc. But under the English law, there is no such
provision.
From afore analysis, we are able to
establish that wasiyyah or Will under the Islamic law is of a divine nature,
deriving its validity from the Holy Quran and tradition of the Holy prophet
Muhammad (S.A.W).while will under the received English law is never of such
divinity, gaining its origin and authority from Man-made arrangement, i.e. the
Will Act of 1637.
Chapters: 1 - 5
Number of Pages: 65
Price: 3000 NGN
In Stock

No comments:
Post a Comment
Add Comment