INTRODUCTION
Sovereignty is the central pillar of
the contemporary international
system. All regional groupings mention
in their constituent instruments,
“Sovereignty” and “Independence” as
fundamental principle and their
observance and respect is the real
basis of their organization1. Sovereignty
thus presupposes the independence of
states to conduct their affairs
without the interference in, influence
or coercion of any other state. In
bilateral and multilateral relations
between states, sovereignty occupies a
very important place. Thus it is rare
not to find insistence upon it in
important treaties and declarations of
international organizations2.
The United Nations (UN) Charter lists
sovereign equality as the first
principle upon which the organization
is based. Its Article 2(7) protects
states from the intervention of the
organization in their domestic
jurisdiction. The United Nations
Resolution 2625 (xxv) (The Declaration
on Friendly Relations Resolution)
gave, in fact, an important place to the
principle of sovereign equality. It
stipulates that, “All states enjoy
sovereign equality, they have equal
rights and duties and are equal
members of the international
community, notwithstanding differences of
economic, social, political, or other
nature”.1
It is thus apparent that sovereign
equality presupposes that each
state enjoys the rights inherent in
full sovereignty3. The declaration
contained in the paragraph above makes
it clear that the principles
embodied in it constitutes the basic
principles of international law and as
such would be the guidelines which all
states and not only members of the
organization should conduct their
mutual relations. Within the UN, there
is no diminishing importance of
sovereignty. It is the central feature of the
organization4.
There is no doubt that, while respect
has been accorded independent
states, particularly, in the area of
non-intervention in their domestic affairs,
new issues have continued to emerge in
international law and that is in the
area of human rights protection. Thus
human rights have made a
significant impact on international
law. It has particularly affected the
sovereignty of states and the
assumption that international law is solely a
state based system5. There is now a
general agreement that human rights
are a matter of legitimate
international concern and they are appropriately
a part of the international legal
system.
It is in this vein that claims of
title to territory cannot be made
without some consideration of the
rights of the inhabitants of that
territory6. This has meant that state
sovereignty has been limited as the
treatment of an individual by a state
is a matter of international concern
and not a matter purely for national
jurisdiction. Other issues too have
continued to affect this doctrine of
sovereignty aside from claims of
human rights violations7. These issues
include claims as to possession of
weapons of mass destruction, as in the
case of United States and Iraq; self
defense, intervention to protect the
lives and properties of nationals and
intervention to enforce provisions of
a treaty8.
TOPIC: THE CONCEPT OF SOVEREIGNTY IN INTERNATIONAL LAW: ISSUES CHALLENGES AND LESSONS FOR NIGERIA
Chapters: 1 - 5
Delivery: Email
Delivery: Email
Number of Pages: 75
Price: 3000 NGN
In Stock

No comments:
Post a Comment
Add Comment