CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background to the Study
Nigeria is a multi-religious,
multi-ethnic, and multicultural society with enormous potential for
socio-economic, industrial and democratic development (Imobighe, 2003).
However, intense conflicts and violence that manifested within the nation even
right from the colonial rule have plagued and crippled effective development and
progress in the country (Aliyu, 2009). Nigeria, like other African countries
has been bedeviled by several forms of conflicts that have posed a mortal
challenge to the State and its structures (Gyong and Ogbadoyi, 2013). Nigeria
as a nation is usually characterized as a deeply divided state in which major
political issues are vigorously contested along the lines of complex ethnic,
religious, and regional divisions (Eghosa, 2009). According to Bassey and
Oshita (2007:57), ethno-religion is one of the most personal, but emotive
phenomena and it is an important area that generates the most pervasive
conflict in Nigeria, the resolution of which can hardly be effected durably.
Hence, ethno-religious conflict occurs when the ultimate goal of conflict is of
ethnic and religious nature and such conflicts are often associated with ethnic
or religious sentiments. Thus, the usage of the concept denotes the fact that
all crises that have religious and ethnic undertones are ethno-religious
conflicts (Yakubu, 2005:19). In Nigeria, an unprecedented number of conflicts
arising from mostly religious-based disputes have been witnessed in some parts
of the country since 2009 and the causes of these ethno-religious conflicts may
be connected with the way and manner in which religion is portrayed to its
adherent followers as well as mistrust between the followers of the various religious
and ethnic groups which results in ethno-religious crises (Aliyu, 2009). As a
matter of fact, deeply divided states tend to be fragile and unstable because
there are fewer points of convergence and consensus among the constituent
groups than are required to effectively mitigate or contain the centrifugal
forces that tear the society apart (Eghosa, 2009).
It is incontrovertible to say that ethno-religious
crises have strong implications for the socio-political and economic
developments of Nigeria and this is captured by the comments made by the former
President of the country, Gen. Obasanjo when he asserted that violence has
reached unprecedented levels and hundreds have been killed with much more
wounded or displaced from their homes on account of their ethnic or religious
identification whilst schooling children has been disrupted and interrupted;
businesses have lost billions of naira and properties are destroyed (Gyong and
Ogbadoyi, 2013). It has been estimated that since the transition to civilian
rule in May 2009, no less than ten thousand lives have been lost to
religious-based violence (Presidential Committee, 2002).
Suffice to say that nearly every part
of Nigeria has experienced one form of crises or the other with attendant
consequences. Apart from Kano State, Kaduna which is the case study area for
this study, has registered more than any other city in Nigeria, a superlative
number of ethno-religious disturbances ever in the history of Nigeria
(Ikejiani-Clark, 2007:526). In Kaduna State, there have been conflicts leading
to loss of lives and destruction of properties in Kasuwan Magani in 2010,
Kaduna in 2013, Gure/Kahugu in 1986, Kafanchan in 1987, Kaduna in 1987 and
Zango Kataf in 1992, Kafanchan in 2009 and Kaduna, Kachia and Birnin Gwari in
February 2000 (Okoye, 2000: xii-xiv), and in 2002 (occasioned by the
introduction of Sharia legal system and the Miss World pageant) (Gyong and Ogbadoyi,
2013). During these periods, many people were killed, houses burnt, religious
homes battered, properties destroyed, and several people were displaced. The
frequency and enormity of these ethno-religious conflicts have foisted a
general threat to the security of the citizens, which are not only affecting
the nation, but also economic activities of the State, given the manifestation
of illegal small arms (Gyong and Ogbadoyi, 2013). Today, the power of the State
is gradually becoming weakened and this may be so because presently a lot of
weapons (particularly small arms and light weapons) have illegally found their
way into the hands of non-State actors, whose motives and intensions are at
variance with those of the State (Aliyu, 2009; Gyong and Ogbadoyi, 2013).
Consequently, small arms and light weapons that were originally intended for
the protection of nation-States have become major source of internal threat to
individuals and Nigeria at large.
According to Gyong and Ogbadoyi
(2013), small arms are generic term covering weapons which may be carried by a
man. According to Smith and Haslam (2013:195), small arms are weapons which are
generally man-portable and fire flat trajectory profile. According to Jekada
(2005), Light weapons are generic term used to describe all conventional
munitions that can be carried by an individual combatant or by a light vehicle
and this includes bazookas, rocket propelled grenades, light anti-tank
missiles, light mortars, shoulder-fired anti-aircraft missiles and hand placed
landmines. The unique characteristics of small arms and light weapons such as
easily compact, powerful, highly destructive, relatively inexpensive and easy
to operate, conceal, and transport have made their proliferation a very
lucrative business world-wide (Gyong and Ogbadoyi, 2013). It is believed that,
more than 500 million small arms are in existence globally, and these are
produced in large numbers in over 70 countries (Gyong and Ogbadoyi, 2013). Realizing
the destructive effects of small arms and light weapons to the national
security, given the numerous conflicts worldwide, several steps have been taken
to control their trafficking, proliferation and use (Lanre, 2009). Even with
these several steps, the trafficking, proliferation and misuse of small arms
and light weapons continue unabated as intra- conflicts continue (Gyong and
Ogadoyi, 2013). Their availability as well as relative inexpensive costs
continue not only to fuel crises but have been dominant and destabilizing
effects in ethno-religious crises, particularly in Kaduna State where most of
such violence have taken place over the years (Aliyu, 2009). In fact, no real
progress seem to have been made in the crucial field of control of the use of
small arms and light weapons, as their spread and use continue unabated
vis-à-vis frequent ethno-religious conflicts, and the attendant insecurity and
resultant socio-economic impoverishment (Gyong and Ogadoyi, 2013).
Even though, the Federal Government of
Nigeria has put in a lot of effort in order to solve or reduce the menace of
religious conflict in the country, in most cases these efforts have yielded
little or no success. The fact remains that these measures have only resulted
in limited restraint as situations (ethno-religious conflicts) precipitating
demands for arms remain unresolved. Therefore, the government needs to be
proactive especially in the area of proliferation of small arms and light
weapons to its policies on religious-based conflict prevention and resolution.
It is in this regard that this study is designed to identify the causes of
proliferations of small arms and light weapons and its impacts on
ethno-religious crises in Kaduna metropolis.
1.2 Statement of the Problem
Due to the strategic position of
Nigeria in Africa, the country has become a receptacle of arms flowing from
other war-torn countries of the African region and the sources and level of these
illegal small arms in circulation in Nigeria can hardly be ascertained. It is
believed that the frequency of political and ethno-religious violence has led
to arms build-up in the country. As from January to September 2007, the Former
Inspector General of Police, Mike Okiro, revealed that about 1,582 arms and
6,614 rounds of ammunition were recovered from various parts of the country
(Gyong and Ogbadoyi, 2013). Local observers have estimated that few thousand
weapons melted down from the cameras is only a fraction of the number of
weapons in circulation. The sources of these illegal small arms remain a
mystery. Given this observation, it is also difficult to say categorically the
sources of illegal small arms and light weapons in Kaduna State, as Gyong and
Ogbadoyi (2013) rightfully posited. If it is so, the question then is, how can
one identify the various sources of illegal small arms and light weapons in
Kaduna State? The next question would be; what are the causes of the
proliferations of illegal small arms and light weapons in Kaduna State? Some
people are of the view that ethno-religious groups might have equipped their
followers and thugs with various weapons ahead of time, which are either
smuggled into the country or produced locally to perpetuate violence
(Olorunfemi, 2006:34). This may be connected with the fact that most of the
crises in the State are either fought along ethnic or religious lines. In
Nigeria, Kaduna state more than any state, seems to have become can be referred
to as ‗hot bed‘ because of the constantly generating religious crises of high
magnitude in the area (Agbese, 2002). The ethno-religious crises in Kaduna
metropolis have led to destruction of lives and properties and displacement of
people. Suffice to say that most of the deaths recorded and injuries sustained
in this ethno-religious conflicts are believed to be caused by small arms and
light weapons illegally acquired by the inhabitants of the area. Many
researchers believed that the availability and use of these weapons is believed
to fuel ethno-religious conflicts, with untold consequences on development.
In spite of these attempts of the
Federal Government of Nigeria to abate the illegal use of small arms and light
weapons, proliferation and use of these offensive weapons continue unabated.
This therefore appears to show that the entire situation has surpassed
government solutions. What then is responsible for this? Since the obvious
causes of conflicts in Kaduna tend to be rooted in religious, economic and
social inequalities and imbalance among people in the area, which are often not
properly resolved, it is possible to anticipate more eruptions which leads to
the desire then may be to keep these weapons in case of a relapse of the
conflicts. It is against this backdrop that this study seeks to examine the
impact of ethno-religious crises on the proliferation of small arms and light
weapons in Kaduna State, with the view to proffering possible solutions to
incessant proliferation of small arms and light weapons and frequent
ethno-religious crises in Kaduna State
1.3 Objective of the Study
The aim of this study is to assess the
impact of ethno-religious crises on the proliferation of small arms and light
weapons in Kaduna State. The objectives of this study are as follows:
1. To examine the various sources of
illegal small arms and light weapons in Kaduna state
2. To discuss the causes of the
frequent proliferation of small arms and light weapons in Kaduna state
3. To assess the impacts of the
ethno-religious crises on proliferation of small arms and light weapons in
Kaduna state
4. To proffer possible solutions to
frequent reported cases of insecurity in Kaduna state
TOPIC: IMPACT OF ETHNO-RELIGIOUS CRISES ON THE PROLIFERATION OF SMALL ARMS AND LIGHT WEAPONS IN KADUNA STATE
Format: MS Word
Chapters: 1 - 5
Delivery: Email
Delivery: Email
Number of Pages: 60
Price: 3000 NGN
In Stock

No comments:
Post a Comment
Add Comment