ABSTRACT
The radiation dose received by the
patient during the radiological examination is essential to prevent risks of
exposure. The aim of this work is to study organ equivalent and effective dose
s for common diagnostic radiographic examinations at General hospital Dutsin-Ma
local Government Area, Katsina State, Nigeria. We estimated the entrance
surface dose received by patients undergoing diagnostic Xray examinations,
including the entrance surface dose and effective doses for 20 patients in six
types of X-ray examinations. The entrance surface dose was determined
indirectly via measurements and from knowledge of X-ray output factors. We
entered measurement parameters such as X-ray dose output, backscatter factor,
and focus to skin distance as well as physical parameters such as mAs and kV in
mathematical model. The mean for entrance surface doses and effective doses for
chest (PA, AP), abdomen (AP) and skull (AP, Lateral) are 0.2432 mGy, 0.2857
mGy, 0.6331 mGy, 0.7553 mGy, 0.3220 mGy and 0.01216 mSv, 0.01428mSv, 0.07597
mSv, 0.00755 mSv and 0.00322 mSv respectively. The results obtained were
compared with those published by some national and international agencies. The
entrance surface dose and effective dose reported in this study are generally
lower than the comparable reference dose values published in the literature. On
the basis of the result obtained in this study, one can conclude that proper
use of radiological parameter such as the large distance between patient and
X-ray source, high tube potential and low tube current can significantly reduce
the absorbed dose which has been shown in this work. When technical and clinical
factors are optimized or properly used, patient doses will reduce
substantially. Further studies are required for minimization of radiation doses
to sensitive organs.
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background of the study
Nowadays human organ imaging is
performed by different systems and methods. As the new diagnostic methods
including conventional radiography, fluoroscopy, and computed tomography (CT)
procedures will continue to provide tremendous benefit to modern health care,
radiography is expected to be in progress as well, because it is still a
powerful tool with enough benefit for the patients undoubtedly. Therefore,
patients’ exposure to radiation has been increased all over the world due to
this radiography (The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological
Protection, ICRP publication 103, 2007; European Commission, European Guidance
on Estimating Population Doses from Medical X-Ray Procedures. Radiation
Protection N.154, 2008; Fazel et al., 2009; Hart et al, 2010; United
Nations Scientific Committee Effects Atomic Radiation 2010). A wide range of
radiation absorbed doses is delivered to patients by the various diagnostic imaging
modalities that use ionizing radiation. Even though these procedures are
assumed to produce a net benefit, the potential for radiation-induced injuries
to the patient exists (The AAPM/RSNA Physics Tutorial for Residents Typical
Patient Radiation Doses in Diagnostic Radiology 1, 1999). Since using ionising
x-rays is associated with some risk of developing cancer, the basic radiation protection
concept or philosophy ALARA states that all exposures must always be kept ‘As
Low As Reasonably Achievable’ (National Council on Radiation Protection and
Measurements, 1990). So, the knowledge of the radiation dose received by the
patient during the radiological examination is essential to prevent risks of
exposures that involve a great number of people. Various indicators are used to
estimate detriment from cancer and genetic effects of radiation. According to
ICRP 60, the basic quantity associated with the risk of deleterious effects on
health is the effective dose that is the valuable and central quantity for dose
limitation in the field of radiological protection of the patient
(International Commission on Radiological Protection, 1991). This dose
descriptor is being increasingly used to determine the quantity of radiation
dose received by patient undergoing diagnostic x-ray examinations (Brenner and
Huda, 2008; Kharita et al., 2010; Mettler et al, 2008; Osei and
Darko, 2013; Shahbazi-Gahrouei and Baradaran-Ghahfarokhi, 2013; Teles et al.,
2013).
Whereas effective dose (ED) is
affected by patient structure and radiological method, as such, the calculation
of this quantity is of utmost importance. Because it is almost impossible to
directly measure effective dose during clinical procedures, it must be
determined indirectly. In general, indirect estimate of effective dose starts
from incident air kerma (Ka,i) measurement as input parameters and uses
dedicated conversion coefficients (European Commission, European Guidance on
Estimating Population Doses from Medical X-ray Procedures, Radiation Protection
N.154, 2008; International Atomic Energy Agency, 2007; International Commission
Radiation Units, 2005). Entrance skin dose (ESD) is also an important parameter
in accessing the dose received by a patient in a single radiographic exposure.
The European Union has identified this physical quantity as one to be monitored
as a diagnostic reference level in the hopes of optimizing patient dose (Bushong,
2001 and ICRP, 1991).
Patient doses in diagnostic x-ray
examinations can be best estimated in terms of entrance surface dose (ESD) per
radiograph or dose area product (DAP) for the complete examination (European Commission,
1996). On the other hand, the effective dose is the best quantity for
estimating radiation risks to the patients. The major benefit of using the
effective dose is that this parameter accounts for the absorbed doses and
relative radio-sensitivities of the irradiated organs in the patients and, therefore,
better quantifies the patient risks (ICRP, 1991). Studies aimed at achieving
low patient doses with sufficient image quality have continue to be of interest
in research (ICRP, 1991 and United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects
of Atomic Radiation, 2000). With the challenges enumerated above, it is
therefore important to study the organ equivalent and estimate the effective
doses for different diagnostic x-ray projections at General Hospital, Dutsin-Ma
Local Government Area, Katsina State.
1.1 Justification
At the General Hospital Dutsin-Ma,
large numbers of diagnostic x-ray radiology are conducted yearly for various
purposes. However, most examinations carried out do not have records of doses received
by the patients. Therefore, adequate radiation dose (patients` organ equivalent
and effective dose) management is hindered and difficult. While methods to
calculate effective doses have been established, they depend heavily on the
ability to estimate the dose to radiosensitive organs from radiological
procedure(s). The determination of the radiation dose to these organs is very
difficult and direct measurement is not possible. Therefore organs doses are
estimated from measurable quantities such as the dose-area product (DAP) or
entrance surface dose (ESD) associated with the radiological examination and
normalised organ doses data. The exposure to high level of diagnostic x-ray may
lead to cancer. There is therefore the need to estimate the organ equivalent
and effective dose in order to know whether it poses a health risk to the
inhabitants. The imaging procedure should be judged to do more good (e.g., diagnostic
efficacy of the images) than harm (e.g., detriment associated with radiation
induced cancer or tissue effects) to the individual patient. Therefore, all examinations
using ionizing radiation should be performed only when necessary to answer a
medical question, treat a disease, or guide a procedure. The clinical
indication and patient medical history should be carefully considered before
referring a patient for x-ray examination.
1.2 Aim and Objectives
The aim of this study is to
investigate patients’ doses from radiological examinations. The objective of
this study includes:
To establish some reference and
guidance dose values for radiological examinations
performed at the hospital.
To monitor any changes over time
that might arise from aging equipment or changing
protocols, and
To compare the patient’s
examinations with that of other hospitals and regions as reported in
literature.
TOPIC: ESTIMATION OF ORGAN EQUIVALENT AND EFFECTIVE DOSES FROM DIAGNOSTIC X-RAY AT GENERAL HOSPITAL
Chapters: 1 - 5
Delivery: Email
Delivery: Email
Number of Pages: 50
Price: 3000 NGN
In Stock

No comments:
Post a Comment
Add Comment