ABSTRACT
This research was carried out in order to examine the
impact of auditing on quality financial reporting in Nigeria. The study aimed
at examining, investigating and ascertaining the interaction between audit
quality and corporate financial reporting in Nigeria. Hence, the study is a
movement towards improving the quality of audit practice in Nigeria. In conducting
this research both primary and secondary data were used. The study captured the
opinions of respondents including auditors, shareholders, brokers, analysts,
regulators, management, academics and others users of financial information.
The primary data were got from three hundred and fifty returned and usable
copies of questionnaire, while the secondary data were generated from the
financial statements of forty annual reports of companies quoted on the
Nigerian Stock Exchange. The data gathered were used to test the research
hypotheses and answer some of the research questions. The study found a
significant and positive relationship between audit quality and the quality of
financial reporting.
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1
Background to the study
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
In
recent times, auditors have been put under pressure to ensure that their
reports constitute assurance to investors that their funds are put into good
use and properly accounted for. In Nigeria, every incorporated company is
required to appoint an external auditor, who is required to render an
independent opinion on the financial statements; whether or not they show a
true and fair view. The Companies and
Allied Matters Act (1990) states that every auditor of a company shall have
a right of access, at all times, to the books, accounts and vouchers of the
company and to such information and explanations as may be necessary in the
course of an audit. The auditor shall make a report to the members of the
company on the accounts examined by them. The auditor in performing his duties
is expected to exercise all care, diligence and skills as is reasonably
necessary in each particular circumstance.
Audit
report is the medium through which the auditor expresses his opinion on the
financial statement examined by him. Due to familiarity, threat of replacement
of an auditor, provision of book-keeping services by the auditor and many other
factors, the auditor may want to issue an unqualified audit report even when
the situation on ground proved otherwise. This situation raises doubt about the
independence of an auditor. Independence is the cornerstone of accountability.
The challenge is that corporate management hires, fires, and pays both their
internal and external auditors. Auditors, therefore, develop good relationships
with management to keep the job of the client. They may not, therefore, be
independent of the corporate management. In the United States of America, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (2002) prevents
auditors from providing non-audit services to their clients. Nevertheless,
auditors will understandably, want to keep their clients for as long as
possible (George, 2003). In Nigeria, there have been a number of audit
failures, some leading to the restatement of figures in the financial
statements. For example, Lever Brothers, African Petroleum and Cadbury, just to
mention a few important ones. Although, it
has not been proved by any detailed investigation that these audit failures were
due to impairment of auditor’s independence it could reasonably be suspected to
be a contributing factor (Adelaja, 2009). Many researchers in the developed
nations have investigated the extent of audit independence. For example,
Harrast and Mason-Olsen (2007); Abu Baker and Ahmad (2009); Abdullah (2008);
Ismail et al. (2008); Sikka (2009);
Geiger and Raghunandan (2002) and Zhang et
al. (2007). All these studies were conceptualized and executed from the
perspectives of developed nations. However, in Nigeria, there is a
paucity of empirical studies in the same direction. The foregoing
perspectives, therefore, make it desirable to investigate the impact of audit
independence on corporate financial reporting in Nigeria.
Audit quality practices are procedures established by
auditors to ensure that financial reports communicate relevant and reliable
information to members of an organisation and the public. These practices vary
from one audit organisation to the other depending on their sizes, nature of
activities and applicable legislations. Literature documents differences in
opinion as to what constitutes appropriate definition of audit quality. Saleh
and Azary (2008:65 -77) view audit quality as how well an audit detects and
reports material misstatements, reduces information asymmetry between
management and stockholders and thus assist protect the interest of
stockholders. From the reasoning of Palmrose (1988), audit quality is the
probability that financial statements contain no material misstatements. Also,
Davidson and Neu (1993: 479 - 488) define audit quality as a function of the
auditor’s ability to detect and eliminate material misstatements and
manipulations in reported net income. While De Angelo (1981) reports audit
quality as the market assessed joint probability that a given auditor will both
discover a breach in the client’s accounting system and report the breach.
These definitions, no matter how divergent, emphasis compliance with relevant
audit procedures and standards (Al -Khaddash, et al., 2013). Users of
financial statements demand nothing less than a report that conveys accurate
and reliable information relevant for decision making. This is made possible by
auditors through the provision of quality services. Salehi and Kangarlouei
(2010) investigated the effect of audit quality on accrual reliability of
listed companies and found existence of more accrual stability coefficient in
audit firms with higher audit quality than those with lower audit quality.
Similarly, Al-Khaddash et al. (2013) did a work on the factors affecting
the quality of auditing, drawing data from Jordanian commercial Banks. Results
indicate a positive and significant association between audit quality and audit
efficiency, the reputation of auditing office, auditing fees, the size of audit
firm and the proficiency of the auditor.
TOPIC: IMPACT OF AUDITING ON QUALITY FINANCIAL REPORTING
Format: MS Word
Chapters: 1 - 5, Abstract, References, Data Analysis
Delivery: Email
Delivery: Email
Number of Pages: 68
Price: 3000 NGN
In Stock
No comments:
Post a Comment
Add Comment