[A Case Study of the Niger Delta
Region]
ABSTRACT
Formation damage has been a constant
headache to the oil producing industries as it is considered an impairment of
the permeability of petroleum bearing formation with an expensive remediation
procedure. Although, the prevention of formation damage is impracticable since
every single operation embarked upon in petroleum production is a potential
source of damage, it could be controlled. In this project, a well was studied
and BHP survey was used from BHP analysis in addition to the information of the
well history and reservoir data available. The well was observed to have been
damaged with a skin of 115 and a damage ratio indicating the well should have
been flowing about two times its present production rate. There are two major stimulation
procedures which are the hydraulic fracturing and the matrix acidization in
which the latter was used in the case of the damaged well. Well 57XX had a
production rate which was initially 1550bbl/day at its peak before undergoing a
decline, increased to 2100bbl/day and then continued to flow at an average of
2000bbl/day before a sharp decline and subsequent gradual declination of
production rate showing the effect formation damage had on the well 57XX. This
in conclusion proved that the matrix acidization technique used to stimulate
the well was effective as it led to an increase in the well permeability and
hence, increased the oil production rate.
CHAPTER ONE
1.0
INTRODUCTION
1.1. General
Background
Formation damage is generally
considered as the impairment of the unseen by the inevitable, causing an
unknown reduction in the unquantifiable (Petrowiki, 2015). Also, it is a
condition which occurs when barriers to flow develop in the near-wellbore
region to give rise to a lower than expected production rate from or injection
rate into a hydrocarbon bearing reservoir rock and it requires
interdisciplinary knowledge and expertise (Amaefule et al, 1988). It can
also be referred to as an impairment to reservoir (reduced production)
permeability caused by wellbore fluids used during drilling, completion and
work over operations (Petrowiki, 2015).
Oil well productivity on the other
hand, is generally considered as the ability of a reservoir to produce
hydrocarbons after the well has been drilled and made ready for production. The
production stage of oil is the most important stage of a well’s life because it
determines if the aim of drilling such well has been achieved or not, and this
can be measured by the quantity of crude oil derived or quantity of crude oil
which is producible. Formation damage is one of the major causes of decrease in
oil production as a result of damage to the formation by reducing its porosity
and permeability which also leads to flow restrictions. Flow restrictions into
the wellbore create additional pressure drops known as ‘skin’ and reduce well
productivity.
Formation damage is known to occur
during any stage of a well’s life; from initial exploration, through appraisal,
through production and through secondary or tertiary recovery and all these
have their various roles which they play in the reduction of oil well
productivity. Formation damage indicators include, among others, permeability
impairment, skin damage and decrease of well performance. Formation damage
according to Porter (1989) is considered not necessarily reversible and what
gets into the porous media does not necessarily come out. It is, therefore,
better to avoid the occurrence of formation damage rather than trying to
restore it. Models for formation damages which have been proven to be verified
can be used to avoid or minimize it (Faruk, 2011). Carefully planned laboratory
and field tests can also help in providing scientific guidance as well as
develop strategies for minimizing the damage. It will, therefore, cause
considerable cost for remediation and deferred production. Accurately designed
experimental and analytical techniques with the modelling and simulation
approaches can be used to understand the evaluation, prevention, remediation
and the control of formation damage that leads to low oil productivity.
Formation damage can occur as a result
of fluid/rock incompatibility; particle migration and deposition may occur as a
function of the chemistry of the clay minerals and the chemical and
electrochemical nature of both the natural formation fluid and the drilling
fluid. Changes in the pore fluid can also induce clay swelling which in turn
reduces the pore spaces in the reservoir and this is considered a form of damage
to the formation as it reduces the productivity of the formation.
The occurrence of the fluid/rock
incompatibility is not as a result of only swelling of the clay and particle
migration and deposition. Formation damage can also occur as a result of the
fluid/fluid incompatibility. The incompatibility of the introduced fluid
(drilling fluid) and the reservoir pore-fluid which creates emulsion blocks can
only be controlled by stimulation techniques that include pre-flush or after
flush techniques. Formation damage caused by various fluids introduced into the
well is remediated by careful treatment design and quality control. The
departure from radial flow in a homogenous and isotropic medium can also be a
cause of formation damage. A positive skin may arise from a reduction of the
area available to flow and/or a departure from purely radial flow (Harper and
Buller, 1986). Formation damage also has other causes such as the mechanical
deformation around a borehole or perforation tunnel, reduction of fluid
pressure during production, etc. Thorough understanding of the formation damage
mechanism’s stringent measures for its control and prevention, and effective
and efficient treatments are the keys for optimum production strategies for oil
and gas fields.
The consequences of formation damage
are the reduction of the oil and gas productivity of reservoirs and noneconomic
operation. Hence, once formation damage has occurred, it is necessary that
proper assessment, planning and treatment will require the cooperative efforts
and knowledge of the geologists, reservoir engineer and production engineer
both in the field and in the laboratory. This combined effort and approach will
therefore help to develop effective solutions to the damage. A wide knowledge
of the mechanism of formation damage is necessary in order for the engineers
and geologists to develop effective, preventive and mitigating procedures.
With recent improvements in
technology, laboratory, geology and engineering, it is easier to achieve accurate
measurements which can provide the necessary insights into the mechanism,
prevention and effective treatment of formation damage (Amaefule et al.,
1988). Confidence in formation damage prediction using models cannot be
achieved without undergoing field testing as they are necessary for the
verification of the models. After the verification of the model, it can then be
applied for accurate simulation of the reservoir formation damage and designing
effective measures for formation damage (Faruk, 2011).
Formation has varying characteristics
and a formation damage model can be used to incorporate these variations into a
history matching process for the characterization of reservoir systems which
can also be used for accurate prediction of future performance. Recent
literature surveys have had various arguments and debate about if formation
damage is considered more detrimental for the vertical wells or for the
horizontal ones. However, the fact still remains that in both cases, the
production loss due to formation damage is significant.
1.2. Statement of Problem
Formation damage over the years has
proven to be a great concern in the minds of oil industries as it is considered
inevitable and is capital intensive if incurred. These concerns have become
more prevalent as we come in contact with many more challenging reservoirs
utilizing even more challenging drilling, completion and production methods.
After drilling and completion of a well, it is essential for the reservoir
engineer to make accurate and essential estimation of the productivity index of
the well which is a function of several parameters, some of which include
pressure, flow-rate, etc. One of the most important parameters which shows how
far a well has been damaged or stimulated is the skin. However, the derivation
of these parameters has been difficult and erroneous due to formation damage
which might have occurred during drilling, completion, work-over etc. It is
therefore, necessary to study and determine ways in which formation damage can
be reduced since studies have shown it cannot be totally eradicated.
TOPIC: EFFECTS OF FORMATION DAMAGE ON OIL WELL PRODUCTIVITY
Chapters: 1 - 5
Delivery: Email
Delivery: Email
Number of Pages: 60
Price: 3000 NGN
In Stock

No comments:
Post a Comment
Add Comment