ABSTRACT
The
study attempted to investigate the planning of educational resources for school
effectiveness in selected secondary schools in Mainland Local Government Area
of Lagos State. The study equally reviewed some important and extensive literature under sub-headings. The descriptive research survey design was
applied in the assessment of respondents’ opinions towards the subject matter.
In this study, four null hypotheses were formulated and tested with the
application of t-test and the Pearson Product Moment Correlational Coefficient
Statistical tools at 0.05 significance level. Also, the simple percentage
frequency counts was used to analyse the questionnaire response of the selected
respondents together with the research questions. A total of 200 (two hundred)
respondents, 50 (fifty) teachers and 150 (one hundred and fifty) students were
selected for this study. At the end of the data analyses, the following results
were obtained thus: Hypothesis one found that planning of educational resources
will significantly influence its utilization, hypothesis two revealed that
there is a significant relationship between planning and management of
educational resources, hypothesis three revealed that there is a significant
difference between the job performance of teachers who teach in schools where
educational resources are planned and those who teach where they are not, and
hypothesis four showed that a significant difference exists between the
academic performance of students who are in schools where educational resources
are planned and those in schools where they are not planned.
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
Background to the Study
The term planning has no doubt enjoyed
wide application across disciplines. However, different institutional context
and socio-political structures determine the specific activity that can be
classified as involving planning. For example, what an architect may regard as
a planning activity may slightly differ from that of a medical doctor, an engineer,
an economist or an administrator. In the same vein, the content of planning in
the former socialist USSR before the break up of the Republic or any socialist
country cannot be the same as that in the capitalize economy like the USA or
any other capital country (Adigwe, 2000).
However, planning has been used to
mean the process of determining in advance, what is to be done, including
classification of goals, establishment of policies, mapping out of programmes
and campaigns and determining specific methods or procedures and fixing day to
day schedules (Newman, 1993). In contemporary usage, Newmans definition appears
limited, since it did not recognize the focal issue that has given rise to the
adoption of planning in every field of economic life. That focal issue is
rationally or optimization of resource use.
Therefore, the term, “planning”
connote a process which essentially involves deciding in advance, the specific
future course of action to be adopted with a view of optimizing the use of
limited organization resources towards desirable and specified goal attainment.
What is clear from this is that planning is a conscious, deliberate, systematic
and rational decision making process, designed to influence future course of
action in an organization or any field of human activity with the ultimate aim
of making the most economical use of the limited resources (i.e. profit or
benefit maximization) (Ayo, 1989).
A plan then is a product of the
planning processes. It is a blueprint for action towards organization goal
attainment in the most effective and efficient manner. The need to plan all
human activities that involves the use of resources to accomplish objectives
have become very necessary for many reasons. Firstly, the fact that economic
resources like time, money, human and other resources are limited relative to
the competitive demand for them makes it desirable that activities should be
planned, to ensure economical use of these resources. Secondly, planning gives
purposeful direction to all actions of organizations; since all actions
generated from planning are usually goal-directed. A well directed activity
facilitates delegation of duties, enhances control and forms a rational basis
for evaluation. Finally, planning enables us to pre-empt future consequences of
organizational activities, which is desirable to adjust actions towards
desirable objectives, thereby avoiding wastages of all types (Duro, 1980).
From the above benefits, we can easily
appreciate why everybody (educational administrator or manager, teacher,
student, house wife, market woman, farmer etc) must involves in planning. The
difference lies in the content and degree of sophistication put inot it.
Educational resources include the
human, physical, material and financial resources in any given school system.
According to Anyanwu (1990), for the educational resources to be managed and
planned well, the school authorities should be on their toes and ensure that
they engage experienced and well groomed personnel to carry out planning and
managing of our educational resources in the school system of Nigeria. For
instance, managers and planners of the Nigerian educational system should
endeavour that teachers and other personnel in the educational sector are well
trained and retrained for them to carry out effective work of teaching and
learning in the school. According to Adigwe (2000), the financial allocations
to the school are not properly managed by the school managers, and this has
caused lack of proper funding of the schools for effectiveness and high
productivity in the system.
Onyenlor (1994) argued that lack of
material and physical resources like the building, the school plants like the
school environment and other resources like the video tapes, audio video tapes
and so on, are not adequately available in the school, and the ones that are
available are not well planned and effectively managed by those who control and
manage the school. Onyenlor summed it up by saying that poor management of the
educational resources such as human, physical, materials, materials and
financial resources have give rise to the poor work performance of teachers and
dismal academic performance of the Nigerian students in our school system. He
advised that, for our educational system to be revived from the decay it has
sunk into, the educational resources must be well planned and managed
effectively.
In education, the importance of human
resources planning and management cannot be over emphasized. This is because,
the role played by human resources management and planning on the
achievement of education objectives cannot be neglected (Iyede, 1998).
According to Odenu (2000), human resources planning and management, involves
planning, leading, directing and a number of other activities in order to
achieve the efficient utilization of human resources. Precisely, it involves
integrating society’s needs with education objectives among other things.
In addition, the extent to which an
organization like education, attains her objectives are directly proportional
to the human resources available and their planning and management. Human
resources management is described by the Institute of Personnel Management
(1963) as “one of the most valuable resources of an organization”.
In another development, Anyanwuocha
(2000) described human resources as the most vital of the resources that are at
disposal of the educational enterprise. The proper management of the human
resources in it, would be apart from an added advantage in attaching
educational goals, it also attracts efficient and quality staff or workforce in
the educational sector (Anyamole, 1990).
The term, personnel administration
refers to management of human resources, the acquisition of personnel and
co-ordination of performance within the organization. Cubson (1985) opined that
there is limited literature in the area of human resources planning and
management. Equally, he added that, since early 1970s, there has been an
increased attention to administrative specialization on education.
Peretomode (1991) and Nwangwu (1994),
state that human researches planning and management are variously referred to
as personnel management. They observed that human resources management and
planning are that functions of all enterprise which provides for effective
utilization of human resources in order to achieve both objective of the,
enterprise and the satisfaction and development of the employees. According to
them, without the planning and management of human resources, staff in the
educational sector would not be effectively harnessed and managed for effective
utilization in education, especially in the teaching learning processes.
The component part of management
concerned with facilitating the accomplishment of the objectives of an
organization through the systematic management of constraints and careful
utilization of the available, limited resources which include human, material,
equipment supplies, finance and work techniques or technology is known as
administration (Peretomode, 1991). According to him, while management deals with
the formulation of policies, administration is fundamentally concerned with the
execution and implementation of the formulated policies, plans or ideas and
programmes. As Amaonye (2000) puts it, administrators are more of implementers
of policies and programmes rather than formulators of programmes and
administration like management, involves such elements and reporting and
evaluating, but this is done on a smaller scale when it is done on a smaller
scale when it is compared with management.
According to Ezewu (1983) “the school
management in the traditional sense is often thought of as involving the
management and planning human resources such as men (teachers and students) and
perhaps money (school finance). The buildings, school space, and equipment are usually
taken for granted as given, for they, are there or “on the ground” as it were
and therefore should not be given attention. But this assumption is unwarranted
for they are actually not there.
Onyeuke (2000), observed that school
facilities means substantial costs to the school system for their
establishment. According to him, if they are not properly maintained and
managed, they depreciate and become dilapidated and even wear out faster than
their normal “life span”, and also if not properly utilized, the school units
would not derive optimum benefits from their use.
Educational resources or material
resources; or educational facilities and or school plant are the ‘things of
education’. These according to Adeleke (1994), include, school building (classrooms,
assembly halls; laboratory rooms and workshops; libraries etc.), teaching aids
and devices such as modern educational hardware and their software in the form
of magnetic tapes, films and transparencies. Educational facilities or
resources are the material things that facilitate the effective teaching and
learning processes in the school.
As observed by Mgbodule (1986),
educational facilities are directly related with the school curriculum.
Mgbodile (1986), described the school plant as the space interpretation of the
school curriculum. According to him, the programmes of the school are expressed
as it were through the school site, the buildings, play grounds the arrangement
and design of the buildings etc.
According to Amaobi (1990), the
logical place to start planning the educational resources or school facilities,
is the development of the educational programme. The school educational
programme should strongly influence the design of the school buildings. The
basic principle here is that no educational facility should impose unwanted
restrictions upon the educational programmes of the school buildings in
Nigerian school system, especially the public school buildings set up to by the
communities in the 1980s, were just set up as buildings to house students
without regard to planning in terms of what educational purposes the buildings
should serve or their place in the delivery of the school programme (Ayo,
1989).
School plant or resources planning
experts agree that curriculum development is a crucial aspect of school
resources planning. For instance, no architect can design a functional
educational need without a clear description of the educational programmes in
the school (Castaldi, 1977).
As Onyeanwu (1990) puts it, it is
advisable that considerable time should be devoted in developing the curriculum
of the school before actual planning or designing of the school building by the
architects begin. For instance, the architect should not only know what
subjects would be taught, but should know the fundamental educational concepts
and students’ experiences that underlie the design of the buildings. The
architects should know what equipment is needed and how much space the teachers
feel a student needs to perform each type of educational experience.
According to Iroegbu (1995), if the
architect lacks the vital information about the school before designing and
constructing the school building, this often results in the design and
construction of who would use them or the community in which school is located.
So, educational resources need to be well planned by experts if there should be
effectiveness in the school, especially in the effective teaching and learning
processes in the school.
Statement of the Problem
School productivity cannot be
effective without adequate planning and management of educational resources,
which include financial, physical and human resources. Often times, planners
and managers of the educational resources for Nigerian Secondary School system,
are not experts and well groomed for planning and management of our educational
resources which should be effective and result-oriented.
For the fact, those who plan our
educational resources are not vast and knowledgeable enough on how to carry out
efficient educational resources planning; the resultant effect has been
ineffectiveness in school productivity. For instance, for the reason of
ineffective educational resources planning and good management, there has been
rote in teaching and learning processes, and this has affected adversely, both
the job performance of teachers and academic performance of students, and
generally, the educational standards of Nigeria as a country.
Purpose of the Study
The objective of this study includes
to:
1. Ascertain
whether planning influence educational resources utilization in the school.
2. Examine
whether there is relationship between planning and management of educational
resources.
3. Investigate
whether relationship exists between school productivity and educational
resources’ planning.
4. Compare
the academic performance of students in schools where resource are planned and
those in schools where they are not.
5. Examine
whether the work performance of teachers in well planned schools differ from
performance of those in schools where resources are not planned.
Research Questions
The following research questions were
raised in this study:
1. Does
planning affect educational resources?
2. Does
any difference exists between the school productivity and educational resources
planning?
3. Will
there be any difference between the academic performance of students who are in
schools where educational resources are planned and those in schools where they
are not planned?
4. Will
there be any difference in job performance of teachers who work in schools
where educational resources are planned and those in schools where they are
not?
Research Hypotheses
The following research hypotheses are
formulated to guide the study:
1. Planning
of educational resources will not significant influence its utilization.
2. There
will be no significant relationship between planning and management of
educational resources.
3. There
will be no significant difference between the job performance of teachers who
are in schools where resources are planned and those in schools where they are
not.
4. There
will be no significant difference between the academic performance of students
in schools where educational resources are planned and those in schools where
they are not.
Significance of the Study
The study will be beneficial to all
stakeholders in the Nigerian school system. For example:
The school authorities at both our
primary and secondary school levels would be able to benefit from the
recommendations and the findings obtained from this study. For instance, the
school authorities and the stakeholders in our educational sector, especially
at the secondary school level, would find this study very important in the
sense that, it will generate new or fresh insight and information on the way
forward to planning and management of educational resources in our various
schools.
Not only the school authorities, the
teacher who is one of the most important and prominent stakeholders in
Nigeria’s educational system, would be able to have good information on
planning and management of educational resources for effective teaching and
learning processes in the school.
With the findings and recommendations
in this study, administrators of our educational system, including educational
planners, would be able to see the need to plan well the educational resources,
because, guiding their usefulness, if the educational resources are not
properly planned and adequately executed by the school administrators, it
results to unproductively in school. This study will be very informative and
directional to the school managers/administrators and planners. This is
because, it will make them to have insights on how best to plan educational
resources and how well to manage them effectively. This work, if completed,
will serve as reference material to researchers and students. Also, this study
will be relevant to other agencies of our educational system, because this
study will help them to understand the move, the positive functions of well
planned and properly executed school/educational resources and the attendant
results.
Scope of the Study
This study examines the planning of
educational resources for school effectiveness in selected secondary schools in
Mainland Local Government Area of Lagos State.
Definition of Terms
In this study, operational and
ambiguous terms were categorically defined thus:
Planning: Plan has been used to
mean the process of determining in advance, what is to be done, including
classification of goals, establishment of policies, mapping out of programmes
and campaigns and determining specific methods or procedures and fixing day to
day schedules.
Physical Resources: Education
resources or educational facilities are regarded as things of the school or
education, which include the building (classrooms, assembly halls,
laboratories, workshops, libraries, etc.) they also include the teaching aids
and devices, which include modern educational hardwares and their softwares
which are utilized in the effective teaching and learning processes in the
school system.
Administration: This
fundamentally concerned with the execution and implementation of the formulated
policies, plans or ideas and programmes of education.
Management: This concerned with
the facilitation or the accomplishment of the objectives of an organization
through the systematic management of constraints and careful utilization of the
available, limited resources which include human, material, equipment supplies,
finance and work techniques or technology.
School Programmes: This means the
activities, events or programmes that take place in the school environment such
as orientation programmes, workshops, seminars or in-house programmes of the
school.
School Plant: This refers to
educational resources or everything concerning the school or education which
includes school buildings, classrooms, assembly halls and the general things or
facilities of education.
TOPIC: PLANNING OF EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES FOR SCHOOL EFFECTIVENESS
Format: MS Word
Chapters: 1 - 5
Delivery: Email
Delivery: Email
Number of Pages: 65
Price: 3000 NGN
In Stock
No comments:
Post a Comment
Add Comment