A SURVEY OF
LABORATORY FACILITIES FOR TEACHING BIOLOGY IN SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOLS IN LAGOS
STATE: A CASE STUDY OF ORILIE AGEGE LOCAL COUNCIL DEVELOPMENT AREA
ABSTRACT
The study tried to find out if
laboratory facilities are available and used in teaching biology. In carrying
out this study, 60 respondents were selected from different schools and Questionnaire
on Science Practical Facilities in Schools (QSPFS) was developed
Percentage, mean and chi-square at 0.05 level of significant were used to test
the hypotheses. The results of the study showed that there are inadequate
laboratory facilities in senior secondary schools in Lagos State and teachers
have a positive attitude towards the conduct of practical activities. The
implication for policy and practice respectively drawn from the study are
that: inadequate science laboratory facilities will hamper teachers’ job
performance; teaching without laboratory facilities is an abstract
teaching which can cause poor academic achievement among students in biology.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
PAGES
|
|
Title Page
|
i
|
|
Certification
|
ii
|
|
Approval Page
Dedication
|
iii
iv
|
|
Acknowledgements
|
v
|
|
Abstract
|
vi
|
|
Table of Contents
|
vii
|
|
CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION
|
||
1.1
|
Background of the study
|
1
|
1.2
|
Statement of Problem
|
5
|
1.3
|
Purpose of study
|
6
|
1.4
|
Research Questions
|
6
|
1.5
|
Research Hypothesis
|
6
|
1.6
|
Significance of study
|
6
|
1.7
|
Scope of the study
|
7
|
1.8
|
Definition of Terms
|
7
|
CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW
|
||
2.0
|
Introduction
|
8
|
2.1
|
The concept of practical work in science
|
8
|
2.2
|
Origins of Experimental Science
|
9
|
2.3
|
Importance of Biology Practical
work
|
11
|
2.4
|
Availability of Laboratory
facilities in Secondary Schools
|
13
|
2.5
|
Practical class and students’
interest
|
15
|
2.6
|
Teachers perception to the conduct
of practical class
|
17
|
2.7
|
Alternatives to Laboratory work
|
18
|
2.8
|
Summary of the Literature Review
|
21
|
CHAPTER THREE: RESEARCH
METHODOLOGY
|
||
3.0
|
Introduction
|
23
|
3.1
|
Research Design
|
23
|
3.2
3.3
|
Area of Study
Population of Study
|
23
23
|
3.4
|
Sample and Sampling Technique
|
24
|
3.5
|
Research Instrument
|
24
|
3.5.1
|
Validation of Instrument
|
24
|
3.5.2
|
Reliability of Instrument
|
25
|
3.6
|
Data Collection Procedures
|
25
|
3.7
|
Data Analysis
|
25
|
CHAPTER FOUR: PRESENTATION AND
DATA ANALYSIS
|
||
4.1
4.2
|
Introduction
Presentation of Results
|
26
26-30
|
CHAPTER FIVE: DISCUSSION,
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
|
||
5.1
|
Discussion of Results
|
31
|
5.2
|
Conclusions
|
32
|
5.3
|
Educational Implication of the
findings
|
33
|
5.4
|
Recommendations
|
33
|
5.5
|
Limitations of the study
|
33
|
5.6
|
Suggestions for further research
|
34
|
5.7
|
Summary of the Work
|
34
|
|
REFERENCE
APPENDICES
|
36
41
|
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background to the Study
Within
the science education community and beyond practical work is carried out by
students as an essential component of science education program (Bajah, 2004).
Questions have, however, been raised by some science educators about its
effectiveness as a teaching and learning strategy. Practical work was generally
effective in getting students to do what is intended with physical objects, but
much less effective in getting them to use the intended scientific ideas to
guide their actions and reflect upon the data they collect.
According
to Abimbola (2008), the use of the laboratory method of teaching science in
general, Biology in particular has become a dogma among science educators and
teachers. On the one hand, they extolled the importance of the use of the
laboratory method in science teaching while on the other hand, they only pay
"lip service" to its use in practice. Science teachers do not usually
find it convenient to make laboratory work the centre of their instruction.
They usually complain of lack of materials and equipment to carry out practical
work. At the same time, it is possible that some of these materials and
equipment may be locked up in the school laboratory store without teachers
being aware of their existence.
The
conditions under which many teachers function do not engender any enthusiasm to
use the laboratory method of teaching science even where they know that these
materials and equipment are available. Class size in urban schools is getting
larger and this does not usually encourage teachers to use the laboratory method
to teach Biology. In some states of the country, teachers go for months without
salary owing to shortage of funds (Daramola, 2004). Biology teachers who fall
in this category cannot reasonably be expected to give off their best to their
students (Ndu, 2008).
Higher institutions in Nigeria charged with the
responsibility of training science teachers at all levels, are increasingly
turning out teachers without requisite laboratory experience. In the view of
Abimbola (2008), a common reason usually given is shortage of laboratory
facilities. Such trained science teachers especially the Biology teachers
usually lack the necessary confidence to conduct practical classes with their
students. Peirce (2008) opines that government seems to have given up on their
capacity to equip all school laboratories. They have therefore resorted to
designating selected schools as "science schools" that they equipped
with their meager resources. They usually use the traditional help received
from the Federal Government in equipping school laboratories for these science
schools.
According
to international standard, science laboratory for junior secondary science labs
should provide a minimum of 1,000 net square feet, while secondary school labs
should provide a minimum of 1,100 net square feet. Each laboratory and each
science classroom should be provided with an instructor’s or demonstration desk
with acid resistant top, sink and utility connections; however, when a science
classroom is provided and laboratory work only is planned for the laboratory,
the instructor’s or demonstration desk may be omitted from the science
classroom.
Fume
hoods should be installed in all laboratories where flammable or toxic vapors
or airborne particulates are generated. Eye wash facilities, fire blanket, and
safety deluge shower, portable ABC rated fire extinguishers, and master shutoff
controls for gas and electricity should be provided in all laboratories.
Gas
outlets should be placed in science rooms where required by the program. Middle
and high science rooms should provide gas only to the demonstration table.
Each
science laboratory should have at least one fixed or portable work station that
provides access to students in wheelchairs and all areas should be adequately
ventilated so that exposure to hazardous or toxic materials is eliminated.
Hoods shall exhaust directly to the outside and should be located away from
building air intake or other openings.
In
Nigeria settings, the white paper on science laboratory requires secondary
school laboratory to have a standard room size /dimension Lab size-36.5ft.x20ft
with capacity to accommodate a group of 25 students in a practical class with
entrance hydrolytic door. Laboratory stools at least 25 Stackable seminar
chairs should be of suitable height to provide ample leg space under the table
and should have broad leg area for stability. Floor with non-skid tiling resist
strong acid and alkali, but also resist scratch, fading, ageing, and strain
resistant. It is free from solvent and non-toxic. Teacher’s table and chair
must be slightly higher in height than routine school furniture for better
monitoring and demonstrations. Marble plate and ceramic plate not only resist
strong acid and alkali but also resist starch, fading, ageing, high
temperature(below1200c) and stain resistant. Proper drainage with covered
dustbins below the table with proper electric points, fitted with water supply.
Water supply Lab must have at least four outlets and four wash basins. Fire
Extinguisher at least one meant for all types of fires. White boards and
magnetic white boards located at suitable height to be easily visible.
In
1988, a report published in the Florida Science Teachers Magazine, Spring
Edition, 1988, by Phillip Horton entitled "Class Size and Lab Safety in Florida"
documented that over 55% of the science classes had enrollments teachers
considered to be "potentially unsafe" for lab work. The average class
size in these "unsafe" classrooms was 31 students. Of the 45% of the
science classrooms teachers considered to be "safe", the average
class size was 23 students. One high school teacher surveyed had two classes
where the number of students was within the designed enrollment capacity and
three classes where enrollments exceeded the room capacity.
Contrasting
the number of accidents between the first two periods and the last three class
size does make a significant difference in traffic flow, individual monitoring,
and understanding of the students!" The facts are clear, increasing the
number of students in a science laboratory increases the likelihood of
accidents. A high pupil/teacher ratio constitutes a threat to laboratory
safety.
There
was little evidence that the cognitive challenge of linking observables to
ideas is recognized by those who design practical activities for science
lessons.
Tasks
rarely incorporated explicit strategies to help students to make such links, or
were presented in class in ways that reflected the size of the learning demand.
The analytical framework used in this study offers a means of assessing the
learning demand of practical tasks, and the effects on students’ academic
performance.
1.2 Statement
of Problem
The
roles of practical class in science subjects during teaching and learning
process are often been overlooked in secondary education. The attitude of
schools towards science practical have not been positive in the recent times as
a lot of schools have science equipment which have never been used or are
hardly used. In some cases, school laboratories are underequipped while some
schools do not even have science laboratories and this may be the reason for
general poor performance in science related courses (Esan, 2005).
Practical
work follows the basic principle of Learning by doing. Students get opportunity
to actively participate in the learning process. But difficulties in
organizing practical classes for students have made the learning abstract (Ojo,
2009). Some teachers have been discovered to be good in theoretical aspect of
teaching but they often fall short of expectation when it comes to practical
aspect due to their unfamiliarity with nature of the work.
1.3 Purpose of Study
The
purpose of this study is to find out if:
1. Practical
facilities are adequate in senior secondary schools based on Nigerian minimum
standard.
2. Teachers
have a positive attitude towards the conduct of practicals.
1.4 Research
Questions
The
following questions guided the study:
1. Are
there adequate laboratory facilities in senior secondary schools?
2. What
are the teachers’ attitudes towards the conduct of practicals?
1.5 Research
Hypotheses
The
following hypotheses guided the study:
1. There
are inadequate laboratory facilities in senior secondary schools
2. Teachers
have a negative attitude towards the conduct of practicals
1.6 Significance of Study
The
finding of this study should be taking as positive contribution to plant
planning in secondary school. The study will also encourage the state ministry
of education, state primary education board, the Heads of private schools and
school managers in provision of science facilities that will stimulate a high
level of participation in the students in practicals and increase their
knowledge of the subject matter since knowledge is better appreciated from
active participation.
This
study will also allow students know the importance of practicals in biology and
this will help to improve their participation in the class.
The
curriculum planners will use the result of this study to evaluate the existing
curriculum in line with the available facilities in the biology laboratory,
with a view of reviewing same to meet the realities on ground and setting
obtainable curriculum for biology practicals in senior secondary school.
This
study will bring to fore the attitude (positive or negative) of teachers
towards the conduct of biology praticals in senior secondary schools.
1.7 Scope
of the Study
The
study covered senior secondary schools in Orile Agege Local Council Development
Area of Lagos State. Both secondary and primary source of data were available
for use.
1.8 Definition
of Terms
The
following terms have been defined operationally as follows:
Perception: the
way you think about or understand something
Laboratory:
has to do with performing experiment
Attitude:
a state of mind or disposition
Practical: of
or concerned with the actual doing or use of something rather than with theory
and ideas.
Format: MS Word
Chapters: 1 - 5
Delivery: Email
Delivery: Email
Number of Pages: 50
Price: 3000 NGN
In Stock
No comments:
Post a Comment
Add Comment