INTRODUCTION
Capital structure is one of the most puzzling issues
in corporate finance literature (Brounen and Eichholtz, 2001). Capital
structure is the combination of debt and equity that make the total capital of
firms. The proportion of debt to equity is a strategic choice of corporate
managers. Capital structure decision is the vital one since the profitability
of an enterprise is directly affected by such decision. Hence, proper care and
attention need to be given while determining capital structure decision. In the
statement of affairs of an enterprise, the overall position of the enterprise
regarding all kinds of assets, liabilities are shown (Velnampy and Niresh,
2012). Capital is a vital part of that statement. The term capital structure of
an enterprise is actually a combination of equity shares, preference shares and
long-term debts. Attention has to be paid as far as the optimum capital
structure is concerned. With unplanned capital structure, companies may fail to
economize the use of their funds. Consequently, it is being increasingly
realized that a company should plan its capital structure to maximize the use
of funds and to be able to adapt more easily to the changing conditions
(Pandey, 2009).
Modigliani-Miller
(MM) theorem is the broadly accepted capital structure theory because it is the
original capital structure theory which has been used by many researchers (San
and Heng, 2011). Capital structure is one of the most important and effective
parameters on the valuation and direction of economic enterprises in the
capital markets. Current changing and evolving environment causes rating
companies in terms of credit to depend partly on their capital structure and
strategic planning, requiring them to select effective resources to achieve the
wealth maximization goal of shareholders (Drobetz and Fix, 2003). During the
financial crisis of 2007, many firms had difficulties in their operations
occasioned by the inadequacy of their capital structures. The financial crisis
affects all the industries and thus it indirectly affects a firm’s performance.
Campello, Graham, and Harvey, (2010) did a study on whether corporate spending
plans differ conditional on this survey-based measure of financial constraint.
The result shows that constrained firms planned deeper cuts in technology
spending, employment, and capital spending. Besides that, constrained firms
also used up more cash, drew more heavily on lines of credit because they
afraid that banks would limit access in the future, therefore they sold more
assets to fund their operations (Campello, Graham, and Harvey, 2010).
1.1 Capital Structure
The
capital structure a firm opts for is only a choice between debt and equity in
financing long term investments. The amount of debt a firm uses for finance
depend on the interest on debt, corporate income taxes, withholding taxes,
personal income taxes, costs of financial distress, and covenant restrictions
in other financing agreements, and other market imperfections (Hovakimian,
Opler, and Titman, 2002). The lower the rate of interest on long term debts,
the higher will be the desire of a firm to opt for it; but higher leverage
increases the risk of financial distress. In the extreme, a firm may find
itself unable to meet its service obligations, and forced into bankruptcy by
disappointed creditors. This normally leads to substantial legal and
administrative expenses and in addition, costs implicit in selling assets at
distress prices. If not forced into bankruptcy, high leverage can make the
firm’s stock less attractive to investors as the probability of financial
distress increases (Flannery and Rangan, 2004).
TOPIC: AN EVALUATION OF CAPITAL STRUCTURE AND PROFITABILITY OF BUSINESS ORGANIZATION
Format: MS Word
Format: MS Word
Chapters: 1 - 5, Abstract, References
Delivery: Email
Delivery: Email
Number of Pages: 71
Price: 3000 NGN
In Stock
No comments:
Post a Comment
Add Comment